Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: 80m coaxial dipole

  1. #1
    Master Navigator KU0DM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Lawrence, Kansas
    Posts
    1,729

    80m coaxial dipole

    Here are my plans: Cut a length of RG-59 for 80m and solder the center conductor and shield together on both ends on each length. Then attach the soldered center conductor/shield to coax the way you normally would.

    See any problems, would you do anything differently, or do you have a suggestion from experience?

    Tnx
    --Dunc

  2. #2
    Administrator ad4mg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    14,845

    Re: 80m coaxial dipole

    Quote Originally Posted by KU0DM
    Here are my plans: Cut a length of RG-59 for 80m and solder the center conductor and shield together on both ends on each length. Then attach the soldered center conductor/shield to coax the way you normally would.

    See any problems, would you do anything differently, or do you have a suggestion from experience?

    Tnx
    --Dunc
    I'd have to revisit this in my antenna book, but most coaxial dipoles I've seen lose the outer shield and jacket on the far ends for at least 1/3 of the overall length.

    Properly built, I believe coaxial dipoles provide some advantage on the amount of bandwidth.

    I really don't know much else about them, but they are quite popular around here for 75/80 meter use!
    QAnon / GOP Republicans mentally lack the necessary intelligence to even tell a decent lie (Ex: A cabal of Satanic, cannibalistic pedophiles run a global child sex trafficking ring and conspired against former President Dotard dRUMPf during his term in office... Jewish space lasers, etc.). What in the hell makes anyone believe these melon heads can actually govern?

  3. #3
    Master Navigator KU0DM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Lawrence, Kansas
    Posts
    1,729

    Re: 80m coaxial dipole

    Just dug a little deeper and found my answer, the coax used for the antenna must be the same as the feedline.

    Would there be anything stopping me from just taking the braid of the RG-59 and using that as a regular dipole?

  4. #4
    Administrator ad4mg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    14,845

    Re: 80m coaxial dipole

    Quote Originally Posted by KU0DM
    Just dug a little deeper and found my answer, the coax used for the antenna must be the same as the feedline.

    Would there be anything stopping me from just taking the braid of the RG-59 and using that as a regular dipole?
    It would stretch like crazy. Let me get a look at the antenna book. It's out in the shack (man cave, some call them "garage"), and I always hit the shack early in the morning.

    Nothing beats a cool summer morning in the shack, watching the sun come up. Sometime, I even turn on the radio, but at that hour, I usually just listen, unless a good one pops up on 30 meters. Speaking of, I'll probably hang a 30 meter dipole up this weekend. I may even get ambitious and make it a WARC band fan dipole! I have way too much 12 gauge wire in the shack ...
    QAnon / GOP Republicans mentally lack the necessary intelligence to even tell a decent lie (Ex: A cabal of Satanic, cannibalistic pedophiles run a global child sex trafficking ring and conspired against former President Dotard dRUMPf during his term in office... Jewish space lasers, etc.). What in the hell makes anyone believe these melon heads can actually govern?

  5. #5
    SK Member (12/2/2011)
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Apison, TN 37302
    Posts
    11,587

    Re: 80m coaxial dipole

    I helped W4KKO/SK build 2 coaxial dipoles from RG8X many years ago. One for 160 and one for 80. Both worked great for about 5 years and were very broadbanded.

    Suddenly both worked sometimes and sometimes went whacky. After lowering both to the ground and doing a little investigation, it was discovered that lightning seems to like dancing back & forth between the center conductor and shield of these antennas, making a mess of the coax.

    Solid hard drawn copper wire antennas replaced them and a super duty tuner was added for frequency excursions far from their cut length.

  6. #6
    Orca Whisperer N2RJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    13,863

    Re: 80m coaxial dipole

    You could try RG6 aerial drop cable that the cable company uses. It won't stretch as much.

    If you really want bandwidth why not try a cage dipole?

  7. #7
    Conch Master KJ3N's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    A secret cave in northern Delaware.
    Posts
    9,113

    Re: 80m coaxial dipole

    Quote Originally Posted by N2RJ
    If you really want bandwidth why not try a cage dipole?
    I prefer 134 feet of wire fed with 450 ohm ladder line directly to a tuner. Barring that, 134 feet of wire fed with 450 ohm ladder line to a 4:1 balun and then to a tuner.

    "Bandwidth issue? We don't have no steekin' bandwidth issue!!"
    "People Who Don't Want Their Beliefs Laughed at Shouldn't Have Such Funny Beliefs" -AD5MB

    "If someone tells you he believes in and talks to an invisible bunny named Harvey, you put him on medication and a regimen of therapy. If someone tells you he believes in and talks to God, well, that's perfectly acceptable. Why that's the case is impossible for me to fathom." - WP2XX



    Latest ClubLog entries.

  8. #8
    Tribal Elder n0eq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Scottsdale Arizona USA
    Posts
    439

    Re: 80m coaxial dipole

    Quote Originally Posted by KU0DM
    Just dug a little deeper and found my answer, the coax used for the antenna must be the same as the feedline.

    Would there be anything stopping me from just taking the braid of the RG-59 and using that as a regular dipole?
    Coax, any coax, with the braid and center connected at both ends
    would simply be a dipole.

    Using "just the braid", if removed from the coax (sounds difficult)
    would be a simple dipole. It would probably be pretty strong.
    It would probably stretch a lot. It would probably have pretty
    large bandwidth.

    A "bazooka" might be what you're think of experimenting with.
    I don't have any personal experience with zook's but it seems
    that the comments I've always read are "it's heavy" "it's
    broadband" "Did I mention it's heavy?".

    Essentially, I'd suggest that if you have no particular need for
    wide bandwidth, use easier to deal with wire instead of coax.
    If you DO have a need for wide bandwidth, use a cage or other
    forms of "more than one wire" instead of the very heavy option
    of coax.

    Probably the only reasonable use for any coax built dipole that
    I can think of would be a temporary field deployed, very durable
    antenna that gets put up and taken down very frequently. It
    would obviously roll and unroll onto a reel much easier than
    most any kind of wire, solid, stranded or braided.

    My field deployed antennas (that's virtually all I use) are
    17 ga bare copper stranded wire from Home Depot. It costs
    30 bucks per 500 ft. Rolls onto reels pretty nicely with the
    occasional kink that needs straightening by hand. Doesn't
    weigh much at all. Strong enough to function as a guy
    as well as the antenna element for inverted Vs. Use
    parachute cord for the tie off's.

    Photos and descriptions of the above style antenna(s) at -
    http://www.digitalcartography.com/n0eq/snorkel.htm


    Craig 'Lumpy' Lemke

    http://www.n0eq.com

  9. #9
    Administrator ad4mg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    14,845

    Re: 80m coaxial dipole

    Quote Originally Posted by KJ3N
    Quote Originally Posted by N2RJ
    If you really want bandwidth why not try a cage dipole?
    I prefer 134 feet of wire fed with 450 ohm ladder line directly to a tuner. Barring that, 134 feet of wire fed with 450 ohm ladder line to a 4:1 balun and then to a tuner.

    "Bandwidth issue? We don't have no steekin' bandwidth issue!!"
    Yep! Doesn't get any simpler or better than that!
    QAnon / GOP Republicans mentally lack the necessary intelligence to even tell a decent lie (Ex: A cabal of Satanic, cannibalistic pedophiles run a global child sex trafficking ring and conspired against former President Dotard dRUMPf during his term in office... Jewish space lasers, etc.). What in the hell makes anyone believe these melon heads can actually govern?

  10. #10
    Orca Whisperer N2RJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    13,863

    Re: 80m coaxial dipole

    Quote Originally Posted by KJ3N
    Quote Originally Posted by N2RJ
    If you really want bandwidth why not try a cage dipole?
    I prefer 134 feet of wire fed with 450 ohm ladder line directly to a tuner. Barring that, 134 feet of wire fed with 450 ohm ladder line to a 4:1 balun and then to a tuner.

    "Bandwidth issue? We don't have no steekin' bandwidth issue!!"
    I have one of those, works pretty well.

Similar Threads

  1. $10 20 meter dipole
    By KC2UGV in forum Antennas
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-25-2010, 09:37 AM
  2. HAMSTICK dipole on 75,40, or 20?
    By Currahee in forum Antennas
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-22-2010, 03:10 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •