Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 26 of 26

Thread: Anti-Kenwood rant

  1. #21
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    The People's Republic of Kalifornia
    Posts
    975

    Re: Anti-Kenwood rant

    This is a really good thread, I have found much of what the autor has discussed in my 820.
    I might point out; having worked on Kenwood stereo gear I find the construction practices to be much the same including the tacky treatment of mains power.

    In my own thread in the Homebres and Mods section I will post my experiences with reworking the 820 VFO which I am a little disappointed with.

    Really who in their right engeneering mind would put ALL the inductance in a VFO tank on a slug tuned form.

    They only do that in tailor parks.

  2. #22
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    On an Island of Islands, EL09sl
    Posts
    4,985

    Re: Anti-Kenwood rant

    Hello.

    If somebody came up with a DDS module that was small and generic (programmable) enough it would be a really neat upgrade for a lot of the older radios.
    The trouble with older radios is both drift and crystal availability.
    This would be so neat, swell even.

  3. #23
    Administrator N8YX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Out in the sticks
    Posts
    26,165

    Re: Anti-Kenwood rant

    Quote Originally Posted by KA5PIU
    Hello.

    If somebody came up with a DDS module that was small and generic (programmable) enough it would be a really neat upgrade for a lot of the older radios.
    The trouble with older radios is both drift and crystal availability.
    This would be so neat, swell even.
    Have a look here:

    http://www.amqrp.org/kits/dds60/



    All that's missing is a controller to transceive a 40-bit control stream (5 bytes total) and you're good to go.

    I've looked into doing this with a PIC and with a BASIC Stamp. I actually have a working prototype put together with the latter; it uses a Grayhill optoencoder in quadrature-output mode for determining direction and rate of tuning. The Stamp I'm using has a clock frequency of 20MHz, which puts its oscillator right smack in the middle of the HF band...something I'm not too happy with. Thoughts are to use the BS2px (shown below) which has a 32MHz clock in place of the original unit. I don't know how much code I'm going to have to modify, though.



    Both of these boards can be tucked into a very small space. The Stamp also allows me to emulate the K3 or TS-570 protocol for computer-control purposes, which is something you cannot easily do via a PIC-based controller.

    The circuit I've come up with also uses an 8-bit serial ADC to implement RIT. Given 256 possible values, I can get +/- 1.28KHz adjustment if I tune in 10Hz steps. Another ADC can be used to read the AGC voltage through a buffer and thereby supply the controller program with an "S"-meter readout ...
    "Everyone wants to be an AM Gangsta until it's time to start doing AM Gangsta shit."

  4. #24
    Conch Master W5GA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    8,550

    Re: Anti-Kenwood rant

    Quote Originally Posted by N8YX
    Quote Originally Posted by KA5PIU
    Remember, Amateur Radio equipment is built to a price.
    And that is exactly what did Drake and Cubic in.
    Actually, in Drake's case, I believe the cause was the company founder (a ham) died, and the kids had no interest in the market.
    When the government's boot is on your throat, whether it is a left boot or a right boot is of no consequence. — GARY LLOYD

    The nation we live in is the nation we have built by design, each successive generation raising the wall of tyranny a little higher. - Chris Griffin

  5. #25
    Administrator N8YX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Out in the sticks
    Posts
    26,165

    Re: Anti-Kenwood rant

    Quote Originally Posted by W5GA
    Quote Originally Posted by N8YX
    Quote Originally Posted by KA5PIU
    Remember, Amateur Radio equipment is built to a price.
    And that is exactly what did Drake and Cubic in.
    Actually, in Drake's case, I believe the cause was the company founder (a ham) died, and the kids had no interest in the market.
    Ahhh....no.

    One of my coworkers is ex-Drake; he was involved in the TR7/R7 and TR5 projects and a lot of their satellite stuff. Management realized two things during the early to mid 80's: Fabrication costs - keeping the quality standards relatively high - compared to the Japanese sets really cut into Drake's bottom line; 2) The ham community at large was beginning to shun the 'Made in America' labels in favor of the all-in-wonderboxes. This is why the surviving clan "...had no interest..." in pursuing further ventures in the amateur market. Money is money, and if the amateur equipment market would have have been as easy to turn a profit as the satellite receiver market was at the time, they would have stayed in the game.

    The decision to exit was purely business, not lack of interest.
    "Everyone wants to be an AM Gangsta until it's time to start doing AM Gangsta shit."

  6. #26
    Orca Whisperer kf0rt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Denver 'burbs
    Posts
    11,068

    Re: Anti-Kenwood rant

    Quote Originally Posted by W5GA
    Quote Originally Posted by N8YX
    Quote Originally Posted by KA5PIU
    Remember, Amateur Radio equipment is built to a price.
    And that is exactly what did Drake and Cubic in.
    Actually, in Drake's case, I believe the cause was the company founder (a ham) died, and the kids had no interest in the market.
    Don't think so....

    This is from an article by Bill Frost:
    The postponed, but eventual decision was made to cease production of amateur radio equipment. The market had all but disappeared, there was a lack of FCC deregulation, the foreign competition was increasing more and more, and the dollar was strong.
    Here: http://www.hamradio.no/la3tq/drakehis.htm

    In fact, the R8 receiver was still produced until 2005 - 30 years after R.L. died.

    The Drake Company today:
    http://www.rldrake.com/index.php

Similar Threads

  1. Kenwood TS-940S
    By N8YX in forum Equipment Reviews
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-24-2010, 08:47 PM
  2. Kenwood TS-940S
    By N8YX in forum Ham Radio Chit-Chat
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-17-2010, 03:47 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •