At the risk of being contrary, did any of you google this guy Titus?
He was convicted at 11, 15 for indecencies against a minor. He was convicted at 18 again for a "Perverted Justice" crime, ie immoral communication with an 11 year old. He did have an abusive childhood and realized he was gay at age 13.
According to W5YI, he had 10 character witnesses at his original hearing including cops and clergymen. He's run a repeater in the Seattle area on 440 with no evidence of any contact with children. He was changed to "high risk" offender status, for bullshit reasons. This guy is now 40 years old with no incidents since he was 18.
The decision busts the guy for 1. late filing and 2. offenses committed when he was a juvenile, an early juvenile at that. Without any further input, it appears this ruling is unfair.
I thought juvenile records were sealed at 18. I also have other problems with this. How many times does the guy have to pay for the crimes committed when he was kid AND there is no evidence of further recividism? No one produced any evidence of further crimes. How many other crimes in other cases have been explained away because the offender was "just a kid"?
Obviously, no one has patience for child molesters and neither do I. Chronic molesters are menace AND do re-offend. This guy hasn't re-offended. Getting caught in a public toilet with a fake badge makes him guilty of whackerism. If Whackerism disqualified hams, we'd lose half the ham population.
The key for this case is he has beaucoup character witnesses. Cops, CO's, therapists, clergymen etc.
It's fundamentally American to forgive and forget. Granted, we may not have the whole story. But based on what I've seen, I think this revocation is kinda bullshit.