Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: HFPacker or FT857?

  1. #1
    Orca Whisperer
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Posts
    22,593

    HFPacker or FT857?

    So, I'd like a little more power out when operating at home. QRP is great, but I don't think operating QRP all the time will be enjoyable for much longer.

    Now, I already have a full-sized transceiver (FT840) which I'm planning to sell to get the 857D. But then I stumbled onto the HFPacker Amp. It's doesn't work on VHF/UHF/6M though.

    So, thoughts? Smaller amp to get a little more power out, or just get the 857?
    Big Giant Meteor 2020 - We need to make Earth Great Again

    http://www.coreyreichle.com

  2. #2
    Conch Master W2NAP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    W2NAP
    Posts
    5,942
    since you said "at home" im thinking you want something to keep at the house? are you wanting to have VHF/UHF all mode capabilities? if not interested in 2m ssb/cw or 440 ssb/cw honestly for a home station id sell the 840 for a ft-950. if you want the 2/440 ssb/cw capability go for a FT-847 or a TS-2000.
    I AM THE VOICE OF THE VOICELESS!

  3. #3
    La Rata Del Desierto K7SGJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    The Desert
    Posts
    16,791
    Quote Originally Posted by KC2UGV View Post
    So, I'd like a little more power out when operating at home. QRP is great, but I don't think operating QRP all the time will be enjoyable for much longer.

    Now, I already have a full-sized transceiver (FT840) which I'm planning to sell to get the 857D. But then I stumbled onto the HFPacker Amp. It's doesn't work on VHF/UHF/6M though.

    So, thoughts? Smaller amp to get a little more power out, or just get the 857?
    Why not do both?

    I have the 857D in the truck, and think it is a great little rig. When I want to use the FT 817 or IC 703 at the house but want a bit more power, I picked up a used FL110 amp for $75. 10-15 watts in = ~100 watts out 160-10. Although not designed for the WARC bands, it will do them with reduced output. It will do AM/SSB/CW/FSK. They don't come along too often, but if you keep an eye out, they do show up. I looked at the HF packer, as well as a few others, but didn't want to put that much into it.
    Last edited by K7SGJ; 06-22-2014 at 07:53 PM.
    A clear conscience is usually a sign of a bad memory

    RIP ALBI-W3MIV RIP RUSS-W5RB RIP BOB-VK3ZL





  4. #4
    Orca Whisperer
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Posts
    22,593
    Quote Originally Posted by W2IBC View Post
    since you said "at home" im thinking you want something to keep at the house? are you wanting to have VHF/UHF all mode capabilities? if not interested in 2m ssb/cw or 440 ssb/cw honestly for a home station id sell the 840 for a ft-950. if you want the 2/440 ssb/cw capability go for a FT-847 or a TS-2000.
    I'm looking for a new rig, so the 847 gets ruled out. But, I am not spending $1500-2000 on a radio lol It's a hobby, not a vocation :)

    Quote Originally Posted by K7SGJ View Post
    Why not do both?

    I have the 857D in the truck, and think it is a great little rig. When I want to use the FT 817 or IC 703 at the house but want a bit more power, I picked up a used FL110 amp for $75. 10-15 watts in = ~100 watts out 160-10. Although not designed for the WARC bands, it will do them with reduced output. It will do AM/SSB/CW/FSK. They don't come along too often, but if you keep an eye out, they do show up. I looked at the HF packer, as well as a few others, but didn't want to put that much into it.
    Well, I'm just looking really to have a little more umph at home. On the road, weight is critical (My pedals are taking me places with this gear), and I don't so much need the extra RF out in those scenarios.
    Big Giant Meteor 2020 - We need to make Earth Great Again

    http://www.coreyreichle.com

  5. #5
    Conch Master W2NAP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    W2NAP
    Posts
    5,942
    847 might be "older" but its a damn good rig. real sensitive rx on VHF/UHF decent on HF and it has KNOBS!!!!!!! local guy here got a 857d not long ago IMO it was so/so and a drifty bastid on VHF ssb.
    I AM THE VOICE OF THE VOICELESS!

  6. #6
    La Rata Del Desierto K7SGJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    The Desert
    Posts
    16,791
    Quote Originally Posted by KC2UGV View Post
    I'm looking for a new rig, so the 847 gets ruled out. But, I am not spending $1500-2000 on a radio lol It's a hobby, not a vocation :)



    Well, I'm just looking really to have a little more umph at home. On the road, weight is critical (My pedals are taking me places with this gear), and I don't so much need the extra RF out in those scenarios.
    I understand. When I'm camping, traveling, and such, I just carry the 817 in a small bag with the essentials. I only use the FL110 amp at the house when I want to use the QRP rig with a bit of power. I
    A clear conscience is usually a sign of a bad memory

    RIP ALBI-W3MIV RIP RUSS-W5RB RIP BOB-VK3ZL





  7. #7
    Orca Whisperer PA5COR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    12,188
    My FT 847 was bought with Collins filters when the transceiver hit the market and was one of the first batches.
    Running the FT 2000-D now, still have the FT 847, won't be sold was worked hard in the 15 years I had it, just needed to replace the on/off switch, and added the modification so it won't fail again, but have a spare one.

    Not ever selling it, as I'm not going to sell the FT 100 I also have with my buildt in AM Xfilter.
    That one is on all day used as FM radio/AM radio and for 2/70 repeaters working here.
    I did the mods on that one too never had a problem since.

    It has a better receiver as the Ft 857/897, tested side by side with several Jota/Joti's.
    Does it have to be a new radio?
    THe only new one here is the FT 847, the others are good 3nd hand ones, even the FT 2000-D...
    "If the Republicans will stop telling lies about the Democrats, we will stop
    telling the truth about them." - Adlai Stevenson (1900-1965)
    “I’m not liberal/conservative, I’m anti-idiotarian.”
    At some point in the last 20 years, the left moved to the center, and the right moved into a mental institution

  8. #8
    Master Navigator
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    2,182
    I think it would be much easier to 'mobile' with an FT817 on a bike than an FT857. I've used my 817 mobile in the past, and it does surprisingly well, even with Hamstick antennas.

    There are other amplifiers out there than the HF Packer, too. There are at least two out of China for the same price as the HF Packer that put out 50 watts and will do bandswitching with the 817 - http://www.sainsmart.com/hf-ham-radi...d-80m-10m.html I see a similar one on EBay that's 100 watts for $239.

    I took the IC7000 out of my pickup because I think it's too nice to abuse that way, and I'm thinking about getting one of these amplifiers and putting my 817 in the truck.

  9. #9
    Orca Whisperer
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Posts
    22,593
    The 857 would be for at home, as would the amp if I go that route.
    Big Giant Meteor 2020 - We need to make Earth Great Again

    http://www.coreyreichle.com

  10. #10
    Whacker Knot WØTKX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Lakewood, CO
    Posts
    26,758
    I have two FT-857s and an FT-847. I really like the FT-857 for mobile/portable use, but it would not be cool backpacking.

    The menus on the FT-817, 857, and 897 are basically identical, so you'd be familiar. However, since this is for home, you might prefer the 897. Bigger knobs.
    "Where would we be without the agitators of the world to attach the electrodes
    of knowledge to the nipples of ignorance?" ~ Professor "Dick" Soloman



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •