Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Star in a Bottle

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Northwest Arkansas (Ozark-St.Francis National Forest)
    Posts
    1,883

    Star in a Bottle

    Could this be the answer to clean abundant energy?



    Commercial reactors modelled on ITER could generate power
    with no carbon, virtually no pollution, and scant radioactive waste.


    KeywordsInternational Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER); Science; Machines; Fusion; Thermonuclear Energy; Stefano Chiocchio; The Sun



    Years from now—maybe in a decade, maybe sooner—if all goes according to plan,
    the most complex machine ever built will be switched on in an Alpine forest
    in the South of France.

    The machine, called the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor,
    or ITER, will stand a hundred feet tall, and it will weigh twenty-three thousand tons—
    more than twice the weight of the Eiffel Tower. At its core, densely packed
    igh-precision equipment will encase a cavernous vacuum chamber,
    in which a super-hot cloud of heavy hydrogen will rotate faster than the speed of sound,
    twisting like a strand of DNA as it circulates. The cloud will be scorched by electric current
    (a surge so forceful that it will make lightning seem like a tiny arc of static electricity),
    and bombarded by concentrated waves of radiation. Beams of uncharged particles—
    the energy in them so great it could vaporize a car in seconds—will pour into the chamber,
    adding tremendous heat. In this way, the circulating hydrogen will become ionized,
    and achieve temperatures exceeding two hundred million degrees Celsius—
    more than ten times as hot as the sun at its blazing core.

    No natural phenomenon on Earth will be hotter. Like the sun, the cloud will go nuclear.
    The zooming hydrogen atoms, in a state of extreme kinetic excitement,
    will slam into one another, fusing to form a new element—helium—
    and with each atomic coupling explosive energy will be released:
    intense heat, gamma rays, X rays, a torrential flux of fast-moving neutrons
    propelled in every direction.

    There isn’t a physical substance that could contain such a thing.
    Metals, plastics, ceramics, concrete, even pure diamond
    —all would be obliterated on contact, and so the machine
    will hold the superheated cloud in a “magnetic bottle,”
    using the largest system of superconducting magnets in the world.
    Just feet from the reactor’s core, the magnets will be
    cooled to two hundred and sixty-nine degrees below zero,
    nearly the temperature of deep space.

    Caught in the grip of their titanic forces, the artificial earthbound sun
    will be suspended, under tremendous pressure, in the pristine nothingness
    of ITER’s vacuum interior.

    For the machine’s creators, this process—sparking and controlling
    a self-sustaining synthetic star—will be the culmination of decades of preparation,
    billions of dollars’ worth of investment, and immeasurable ingenuity, misdirection,
    recalibration, infighting, heartache, and ridicule. Few engineering feats can compare,
    in scale, in technical complexity, in ambition or hubris. Even the ITER organization,
    a makeshift scientific United Nations, assembled eight years ago to construct the machine,
    is unprecedented. Thirty-five countries, representing more than half the world’s population,
    are invested in the project, which is so complex to finance that it requires its own currency:
    the ITER Unit of Account.

    No one knows ITER’s true cost, which may be incalculable,
    but estimates have been rising steadily, and a conservative figure
    rests at twenty billion dollars—a sum that makes ITER
    the most expensive scientific instrument on Earth.
    But if it is truly possible to bottle up a star, and to do so economically,
    the technology could solve the world’s energy problems
    for the next thirty million years, and help save the planet
    from environmental catastrophe.

    Hydrogen, a primordial element, is the most abundant atom in the universe,
    a potential fuel that poses little risk of scarcity. Eventually, physicists hope,
    commercial reactors modelled on ITER will be built, too—generating terawatts
    of power with no carbon, virtually no pollution, and scant radioactive waste.
    The reactor would run on no more than seawater and lithium.
    It would never melt down. It would realize a yearning,
    as old as the story of Prometheus, to bring the light of the heavens to Earth,
    and bend it to humanity’s will. ITER, in Latin, means “the way.”




    http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2...l_Daily%20(123)
    Last edited by W9JEF; 02-24-2014 at 11:54 AM.

  2. #2
    'Grumpy old bastid' kb2vxa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Lakewood, NJ
    Posts
    13,081
    The reality of project is it isn't powered by sea water and lithium, it's powered by immeasurable hubris, misdirection, recalibration, infighting, heartache, and ridicule. Mary Shelley gave The Modern Prometheus as the subtitle to her novel Frankenstein.
    "The universe is under no obligation to make sense to you."
    Neil deGrasse Tyson

    73 de Warren KB2VXA
    Station powered by atomic energy, operator powered by natural gas.

  3. #3
    Pope Carlo l NQ6U's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Maritime Mobile
    Posts
    30,096
    From the Wikipedia:

    Construction of the ITER facility began in 2007, but the project has run into many delays and budget overruns. The facility is now expected to finish its construction phase in 2019. It will start commissioning the reactor that same year and initiate plasma experiments in 2020, but isn't expected to begin full deuterium-tritium fusion until 2027.

    In other words, it may prove to be a good thing for the long haul but isn't going to be much help in the near term—and that's assuming it's successful in generating more power than it consumes, something which no tokamak nuclear fusion reactor has been able to accomplish so far.
    Last edited by NQ6U; 02-24-2014 at 04:26 PM.
    All the world’s a stage, but obviously the play is unrehearsed and everybody is ad-libbing his lines. Maybe that’s why it’s hard to tell if we’re living in a tragedy or a farce.

  4. #4
    Orca Whisperer PA5COR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    12,239
    That safe bit, as in Chernobyl or Fukushima? ;)
    "If the Republicans will stop telling lies about the Democrats, we will stop
    telling the truth about them." - Adlai Stevenson (1900-1965)
    “I’m not liberal/conservative, I’m anti-idiotarian.”
    At some point in the last 20 years, the left moved to the center, and the right moved into a mental institution

  5. #5
    Orca Whisperer n2ize's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Crestwood, New York
    Posts
    33,899
    What we mock today may be reality tomorrow. Imagine decades ago the mockery one would have received telling people that in a few short decades people will have not one but a network of computers in their home networked with computers throughout the world. Imagine the mockery if in 1200 AD one were to say men would traverse to the moon and walk its surface and return to earth.
    I keep my 2 feet on the ground, and my head in the twilight zone.

  6. #6
    'Grumpy old bastid' kb2vxa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Lakewood, NJ
    Posts
    13,081
    Cherry Nobyl and Fuku Shima are uranium fission reactors, this one is hydrogen fusion. Imagine the first test going off like a hydrogen bomb, then what Doctor Frankenstein?

    Mockery today, but 2017 is a lot of tomorrows away, so we have 13 more years to mock before the bomb goes off and we say "I TOLD you so!"
    Last edited by kb2vxa; 02-25-2014 at 05:46 AM.
    "The universe is under no obligation to make sense to you."
    Neil deGrasse Tyson

    73 de Warren KB2VXA
    Station powered by atomic energy, operator powered by natural gas.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •