Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 33

Thread: The Car That Runs On AIR. (Not The Onion)

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Istanbul Expert N2NH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Catskills
    Posts
    22,361

    The Car That Runs On AIR. (Not The Onion)

    Yep. A real car and it runs on AIR.

    We breathe it. Why not drive it?
    Peugeot Citroen this week introduced a car that runs on air. The car manufacturer said the vehicle should be available by 2016.
    "We're quite confident," company spokesman Jean-Baptiste Thomas told The Huffington Post on Wednesday.
    Thomas said the company already had developed four of its "Hybrid Air" prototypes and driven them 12,000 miles.
    Peugeot To Produce Air Powered Car by 2016.

    But wait there's more! The Peugeot car is a hybrid. This car is powered by Air only:



    Seeing is believing. Air is the energy of the future. Zero emissions and the technology is here now.
    “The basic tool for the manipulation of reality is the manipulation of words. If you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use the words."
    --Philip K. Dick

  2. #2
    "Island Bartender" KG4CGC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    EM84ru, Easley SC
    Posts
    51,675
    Virginia legislatures would go around slashing their tires while screeching, "Where's your precious air now?"

  3. #3
    Orca Whisperer PA5COR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    12,227
    It is an already older concept.
    The assembly plant is due to start construction in early 2002 and be ready for production in 2003. The car has a 50hp engine, a range of 312 Km (195 Miles) and can run 100Km (62.5 Miles) on ?0.6 ($0.625USD). Top speed is 120Km/h (75MPH). It can be refueled in around 3 minutes by a compressed air machine (300 bar internal pressure) in a propperly equiped gas station, or in around 4 hours by a built-in air compressor plugged into a household-variety power socket. An outline of the concept can be found here.
    Although initially slated for the public transportation, taxis,distribution and logistics markets (evaluation units on pre-order from several local companies), it is expected to have some penetration into the consumer market.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motor_D..._International
    "If the Republicans will stop telling lies about the Democrats, we will stop
    telling the truth about them." - Adlai Stevenson (1900-1965)
    “I’m not liberal/conservative, I’m anti-idiotarian.”
    At some point in the last 20 years, the left moved to the center, and the right moved into a mental institution

  4. #4
    "Island Bartender" KG4CGC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    EM84ru, Easley SC
    Posts
    51,675
    Last time this was brought up, my understanding was that the US would not allow it here. Similar to the 75mpg VWs. Not allowed on US roads.

  5. #5
    Istanbul Expert N2NH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Catskills
    Posts
    22,361
    Quote Originally Posted by KG4CGC View Post
    Last time this was brought up, my understanding was that the US would not allow it here. Similar to the 75mpg VWs. Not allowed on US roads.
    New York has been using LNG* on their buses for at least 15 years as a "green" alternative to gas. I wonder how hard it would be to convert them to Liquid Nitrogen?

    *Liquified Natural Gas
    “The basic tool for the manipulation of reality is the manipulation of words. If you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use the words."
    --Philip K. Dick

  6. #6
    Orca Whisperer n2ize's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Crestwood, New York
    Posts
    33,899
    Quote Originally Posted by N2NH View Post
    New York has been using LNG* on their buses for at least 15 years as a "green" alternative to gas. I wonder how hard it would be to convert them to Liquid Nitrogen?

    *Liquified Natural Gas
    Think about it. What would be the difference between using the stored potential energy of nonflammable compressed or liquefied nitrogen to perform the work of moving a bus versus using a combustible fuel like natural gas ?
    I keep my 2 feet on the ground, and my head in the twilight zone.

  7. #7
    "Island Bartender" KG4CGC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    EM84ru, Easley SC
    Posts
    51,675
    Quote Originally Posted by N2NH View Post
    New York has been using LNG* on their buses for at least 15 years as a "green" alternative to gas. I wonder how hard it would be to convert them to Liquid Nitrogen?

    *Liquified Natural Gas
    In the late 70s and 80s I saw quite a few LNG fleet vehicles around here. Delivery vans and other vehicles in thatr size range, even converted passenger vans used by florists. By 1986/87 they just faded away.

  8. #8
    Istanbul Expert N2NH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Catskills
    Posts
    22,361
    Quote Originally Posted by KG4CGC View Post
    In the late 70s and 80s I saw quite a few LNG fleet vehicles around here. Delivery vans and other vehicles in thatr size range, even converted passenger vans used by florists. By 1986/87 they just faded away.
    Last that I saw, they still had a fleet of those buses in West Brooklyn. Seemed to work as the air was pretty good there.

    The second air car is not converting Liquid Nitrogen into electricity to run an electric motor. It is actually running the engine.
    “The basic tool for the manipulation of reality is the manipulation of words. If you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use the words."
    --Philip K. Dick

  9. #9
    "Island Bartender" KG4CGC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    EM84ru, Easley SC
    Posts
    51,675
    Quote Originally Posted by N2NH View Post
    Last that I saw, they still had a fleet of those buses in West Brooklyn. Seemed to work as the air was pretty good there.

    The second air car is not converting Liquid Nitrogen into electricity to run an electric motor. It is actually running the engine.
    They could use a diesel engine to turn the compressor when it needed a charge. It would hardly use jack shit for fuel as the engine wouldn't have to be over 500cc. An electric motor with a weighted flywheel could be turned off the compressed air engine to keep the electricals going. When you come to a stop, the flywheel would keep it turning but there would also be a battery, just one or two car battery sized batteries, and a couple of large capacitors to keep the headlights up at night when at a stop as well as other electrical need in the interior.
    I discussed this with some other hams in person in 2007 and they all agreed with me. Therefore, I am indisputable.

  10. #10
    Orca Whisperer n2ize's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Crestwood, New York
    Posts
    33,899
    Quote Originally Posted by N2NH View Post
    Last that I saw, they still had a fleet of those buses in West Brooklyn. Seemed to work as the air was pretty good there.
    Con Edison also runs a lot of their vehicles on natural gas.

    ] The second air car is not converting Liquid Nitrogen into electricity to run an electric motor. It is actually running the engine.
    You are correct. But energy has to be consumed to compress the nitrogen in order to make liquid nitrogen. This is not done in the car this is done elsewhere and requires energy. Some of that energy is later consumed when the potential energy of the nitrogen is converted to mechanical energy to run the car.
    I keep my 2 feet on the ground, and my head in the twilight zone.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •