And everything you know is wrong.
And everything you know is wrong.
"The universe is under no obligation to make sense to you."
Neil deGrasse Tyson
73 de Warren KB2VXA
Station powered by atomic energy, operator powered by natural gas.
From: THE LIFE AND TIMES OF GALILEO: Carl J. Wenning, Coordinator, Physics Teacher Education Program, Illinois State University - Link Here.The results of experiments such as these shocked the sensibilities of contemporary scholars. Galileo's experimental methods were entirely foreign to scientists of his day and were regarded by most of his colleagues as undesirable if not dangerous innovations. Accordingly, the results derived in this fashion were also suspect.
The church actually sponsored Gallileo. An interesting thing to do if you disagree with someone. In fact, many of the advances made then to his invention the telescope, were done by priests and long outlived the model he invented. The real reason for restricting Gallileo's movements was his penchant for publishing his work and for the uproar that followed by those who couldn't grasp the change he discovered.
Second Paragraph: Galileo and his Contemporaries -Link HereEarly in Galileo's Battle for the Heavens we are warned that what we were about to see was another example of the "recurring clash between religion and science". Developing this premise was helped by ignoring Kepler and his relations with the Church. Although the Church never provided Kepler with ongoing research grants as they had Galileo [_1_] , they did provide something more important; access to resources and moral support. When Galileo ignored an early request from Kepler to borrow a telescope, it was the Archbishop of Cologne who leant him one. The last of Kepler's books to be published, Somnium, contained a gushing thank you to the Jesuit mathematician, Paul Guldin, an enduring advocate and friend of Kepler. The appendix also mentioned his joy over the gift of a telescope hand-made by the master Jesuit telescope-maker, Niccolo Zucchi. Between these early and later events there were many other events, including the Jesuits chasing down a manuscript stolen from Kepler and ensuring its return, and the Jesuits acting as a surrogate postal service for Kepler.
Wegener was not ridiculed for his theories. He was ridiculed for not being a Geologist. Nobody was trying to prove his theories in the 1960s. They merely had technology catch up to the need to find the Mid-Atlantic Rift. They finally invented the deep-sea submersible, in this case the Alvin, and could find it for themselves.
Interestingly, Darwin despite having the same limitations on his theory, had no such resistance, as seen from this passage.Wegener also shares much in common with Galileo. Wegener probably had at least as strong a case for Continental Drift in 1929 as Galileo had for the Copernican model in 1633. The reason many do not realize this is that the controversy is usually presented as a controversy between Galileo and the Church and not Galileo and other scientists (see Galileo's Battle for the Heavens). As a result most discussions of the early Copernican Model do not even mention any problems associated with the Copernican model. But it was a scientific controversy and it had many of the same elements of the Continental Drift controversy.
From Wegener and Continental Drift, LINK HEREThe main problem with Wegener's hypothesis of Continental Drift was the lack of a mechanism. He did not have an explanation for how the continents moved. Some argue that this failing justified the early reactions to his work and to its dismissal. But Charles Darwin was missing a mechanism for the inheritance of beneficial traits when he published the Origin of Species in 1859. Darwin had amassed a huge amount of evidence that supported some type of adaptive process that contributed to the evolution of new species, much like Wegener had for Continental Drift. He argued that with the natural variations that occur in populations, any trait that is beneficial would make that individual more likely to survive and pass on the trait to the next generation. If enough of these selections occured on different beneficial traits you could end up with completely new species. One major flaw in Darwin's theory was that he did not have a mechanism for how the traits could be preserved over the succeeding generations. At the time, the prevailing theory of inheritance was that the traits of the parents were blended in the offspring. But this would mean that any beneficial trait would be diluted out of the population within a few generations. This is because most of the blending over the next generations would be with individuals that did not have the trait.
In spite of the lack of a mechanism for the preservation of traits, Darwin's theory quickly came to dominate. Within 5 years, Oxford University was using a biology textbook that discussed biology in the context of evolution by natural selection.
JUST LIKE
So close, but alas, so completely and entirely wrong.
Ahem.
Yes Quicks Draw ju are right.
Would you like a lifeline?
Last edited by N2NH; 07-28-2013 at 04:30 PM.
“The basic tool for the manipulation of reality is the manipulation of words. If you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use the words."
--Philip K. Dick
Galileo is one of my heroes but he did not invent the telescope. It may have been one Hans Lippershey, a German-Dutch spectacle maker, based on the fact the he was the first to apply for a patent for one, but no one is entirely sure; the most likely scenario is that, much like with the airplane, it was a number of people building on each other's work. Galileo made some improvements on it but his real claim to telescopic fame was that he was one of the first to turn the device to the sky, write down what he saw and then publish it. For this, he's often called the first real scientist.
Last edited by NQ6U; 07-28-2013 at 05:22 PM.
All the world’s a stage, but obviously the play is unrehearsed and everybody is ad-libbing his lines. Maybe that’s why it’s hard to tell if we’re living in a tragedy or a farce.
All the world’s a stage, but obviously the play is unrehearsed and everybody is ad-libbing his lines. Maybe that’s why it’s hard to tell if we’re living in a tragedy or a farce.
“The basic tool for the manipulation of reality is the manipulation of words. If you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use the words."
--Philip K. Dick
It actually slowed down on the rain and stopped for a couple of days. Road crews are out all over the place moving dirt back into place and packing it down. So many trees fell over that all you could do was cut them up and wait for the rain to stop before hauling off the wood and filling the holes in. Sections of roads were getting wiped out around buried cement pipes that were overwhelmed by saturated soil conditions. There are a lot of places where normal rain isn't an issue but due to daily flash flooding were pushed to their limit.
It rained so much on the Blue Ridge Parkway that roads were literally splitting apart from where the soil was escaping and there was nothing to support the asphalt.
Hope that it all gets fixed and that things start clearing up. We had a day of rain Sunday, but thankfully not much else for nearly three weeks. We could use some time to dry out here too. The lower tier and this area was just told by Guv. Cuomo that they're getting screwed out of flood aid. It is now being sent to the Capitol district area around Albany, NY instead.
“The basic tool for the manipulation of reality is the manipulation of words. If you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use the words."
--Philip K. Dick