Page 63 of 351 FirstFirst ... 1353616263646573113163 ... LastLast
Results 621 to 630 of 3505

Thread: We Could Talk About The Weather

  1. #621
    'Grumpy old bastid' kb2vxa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Lakewood, NJ
    Posts
    13,081
    And everything you know is wrong.
    "The universe is under no obligation to make sense to you."
    Neil deGrasse Tyson

    73 de Warren KB2VXA
    Station powered by atomic energy, operator powered by natural gas.

  2. #622
    Istanbul Expert N2NH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Catskills
    Posts
    22,361
    Quote Originally Posted by n2ize View Post
    Actually many scientists agreed with Galileo. So much so that the model of our solar system was changed, It was the church at the time who conhdemned Galileo and declared he was wrong
    The results of experiments such as these shocked the sensibilities of contemporary scholars. Galileo's experimental methods were entirely foreign to scientists of his day and were regarded by most of his colleagues as undesirable if not dangerous innovations. Accordingly, the results derived in this fashion were also suspect.
    From: THE LIFE AND TIMES OF GALILEO: Carl J. Wenning, Coordinator, Physics Teacher Education Program, Illinois State University - Link Here.

    The church actually sponsored Gallileo. An interesting thing to do if you disagree with someone. In fact, many of the advances made then to his invention the telescope, were done by priests and long outlived the model he invented. The real reason for restricting Gallileo's movements was his penchant for publishing his work and for the uproar that followed by those who couldn't grasp the change he discovered.

    Early in Galileo's Battle for the Heavens we are warned that what we were about to see was another example of the "recurring clash between religion and science". Developing this premise was helped by ignoring Kepler and his relations with the Church. Although the Church never provided Kepler with ongoing research grants as they had Galileo [_1_] , they did provide something more important; access to resources and moral support. When Galileo ignored an early request from Kepler to borrow a telescope, it was the Archbishop of Cologne who leant him one. The last of Kepler's books to be published, Somnium, contained a gushing thank you to the Jesuit mathematician, Paul Guldin, an enduring advocate and friend of Kepler. The appendix also mentioned his joy over the gift of a telescope hand-made by the master Jesuit telescope-maker, Niccolo Zucchi. Between these early and later events there were many other events, including the Jesuits chasing down a manuscript stolen from Kepler and ensuring its return, and the Jesuits acting as a surrogate postal service for Kepler.
    Second Paragraph: Galileo and his Contemporaries -Link Here

    Quote Originally Posted by n2ize View Post
    And when evidence was found to support Wegener;s hypothesis things changed. There was reasoable evidence to support his ideas.
    Wegener was not ridiculed for his theories. He was ridiculed for not being a Geologist. Nobody was trying to prove his theories in the 1960s. They merely had technology catch up to the need to find the Mid-Atlantic Rift. They finally invented the deep-sea submersible, in this case the Alvin, and could find it for themselves.

    Wegener also shares much in common with Galileo. Wegener probably had at least as strong a case for Continental Drift in 1929 as Galileo had for the Copernican model in 1633. The reason many do not realize this is that the controversy is usually presented as a controversy between Galileo and the Church and not Galileo and other scientists (see Galileo's Battle for the Heavens). As a result most discussions of the early Copernican Model do not even mention any problems associated with the Copernican model. But it was a scientific controversy and it had many of the same elements of the Continental Drift controversy.
    Interestingly, Darwin despite having the same limitations on his theory, had no such resistance, as seen from this passage.

    The main problem with Wegener's hypothesis of Continental Drift was the lack of a mechanism. He did not have an explanation for how the continents moved. Some argue that this failing justified the early reactions to his work and to its dismissal. But Charles Darwin was missing a mechanism for the inheritance of beneficial traits when he published the Origin of Species in 1859. Darwin had amassed a huge amount of evidence that supported some type of adaptive process that contributed to the evolution of new species, much like Wegener had for Continental Drift. He argued that with the natural variations that occur in populations, any trait that is beneficial would make that individual more likely to survive and pass on the trait to the next generation. If enough of these selections occured on different beneficial traits you could end up with completely new species. One major flaw in Darwin's theory was that he did not have a mechanism for how the traits could be preserved over the succeeding generations. At the time, the prevailing theory of inheritance was that the traits of the parents were blended in the offspring. But this would mean that any beneficial trait would be diluted out of the population within a few generations. This is because most of the blending over the next generations would be with individuals that did not have the trait.

    In spite of the lack of a mechanism for the preservation of traits, Darwin's theory quickly came to dominate. Within 5 years, Oxford University was using a biology textbook that discussed biology in the context of evolution by natural selection.
    From Wegener and Continental Drift, LINK HERE

    Quote Originally Posted by n2ize View Post
    Unlike
    JUST LIKE

    Quote Originally Posted by n2ize View Post
    Galileo or Wegener decades of research has not convinced anyone that the "Bahgdad Cell" was indeed a cell.
    So close, but alas, so completely and entirely wrong.

    Ahem.

    Quote Originally Posted by kb2vxa View Post
    And everything you know is wrong.
    Yes Quicks Draw ju are right.

    Quote Originally Posted by KJ6BSO View Post
    ^^^What he said^^^
    Would you like a lifeline?
    Last edited by N2NH; 07-28-2013 at 04:30 PM.
    “The basic tool for the manipulation of reality is the manipulation of words. If you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use the words."
    --Philip K. Dick

  3. #623
    SK Member 05/26/2022 WX7P's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Underneath the Atomic Ooze of Hanford, WA
    Posts
    9,756
    Quote Originally Posted by kb2vxa View Post
    Summer isn't over until the fat lady sings and that happens mid to late October.

    Baghdad battery?
    (Galileo) Galileo.
    (Galileo) Galileo,
    Galileo Figaro
    Magnifico.

    Global warming, climate change:
    The ice age is coming, the sun's of an end
    Engines stop running, the wheat is growing thin
    A nuclear error but I have no fear
    Cos London is drowning and I live by the river

    Now get this
    London calling, yes I was there too
    An' you know what they said - well some of it was true!
    London calling at the top of the dial
    An' after all this, won't you give me a smile?
    London calling...

    Nothing really matters,
    Anyone can see,
    Nothing really matters,
    Nothing really matters to me.

    Any way the wind blows.
    Freddy, Joe, and Doris Day?
    http://i138.photobucket.com/albums/q275/nx6d/ham%20radio/SANY1260.jpg

  4. #624
    SK Member 05/26/2022 WX7P's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Underneath the Atomic Ooze of Hanford, WA
    Posts
    9,756
    Quote Originally Posted by kb2vxa View Post
    And everything you know is wrong.
    Only if you're "Weird"

    Everything right is wrong again IF you are a Giant.
    http://i138.photobucket.com/albums/q275/nx6d/ham%20radio/SANY1260.jpg

  5. #625
    Pope Carlo l NQ6U's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Maritime Mobile
    Posts
    29,890
    Galileo is one of my heroes but he did not invent the telescope. It may have been one Hans Lippershey, a German-Dutch spectacle maker, based on the fact the he was the first to apply for a patent for one, but no one is entirely sure; the most likely scenario is that, much like with the airplane, it was a number of people building on each other's work. Galileo made some improvements on it but his real claim to telescopic fame was that he was one of the first to turn the device to the sky, write down what he saw and then publish it. For this, he's often called the first real scientist.

    Last edited by NQ6U; 07-28-2013 at 05:22 PM.
    All the world’s a stage, but obviously the play is unrehearsed and everybody is ad-libbing his lines. Maybe that’s why it’s hard to tell if we’re living in a tragedy or a farce.

  6. #626
    La Rata Del Desierto K7SGJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    The Desert
    Posts
    16,791
    Quote Originally Posted by KJ6BSO View Post
    Galileo is one of my heroes but he did not invent the telescope. It may have been one Hans Lippershey, a German-Dutch spectacle maker, based on the fact the he was the first to apply for a patent for one, but no one is entirely sure; the most likely scenario is that, much like with the airplane, it was a number of people building on each other's work. Galileo made some improvements on it but his real claim to telescopic fame was that he was one of the first to turn the device to the sky, write down what he saw and then publish it. For this, he's often called the first real scientist.

    If he was a REAL scientist, does that mean he knew Morse code?
    A clear conscience is usually a sign of a bad memory

    RIP ALBI-W3MIV RIP RUSS-W5RB RIP BOB-VK3ZL





  7. #627
    Pope Carlo l NQ6U's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Maritime Mobile
    Posts
    29,890
    Quote Originally Posted by K7SGJ View Post
    If he was a REAL scientist, does that mean he knew Morse code?
    Hell, he knew Samuel F.B. Morse himself. They used to hang together in Pisa, drinking Mickey's behind the campanile before it started to lean.
    All the world’s a stage, but obviously the play is unrehearsed and everybody is ad-libbing his lines. Maybe that’s why it’s hard to tell if we’re living in a tragedy or a farce.

  8. #628
    Istanbul Expert N2NH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Catskills
    Posts
    22,361
    Quote Originally Posted by KJ6BSO View Post
    Galileo is one of my heroes but he did not invent the telescope. It may have been one Hans Lippershey, a German-Dutch spectacle maker, based on the fact the he was the first to apply for a patent for one, but no one is entirely sure; the most likely scenario is that, much like with the airplane, it was a number of people building on each other's work. Galileo made some improvements on it but his real claim to telescopic fame was that he was one of the first to turn the device to the sky, write down what he saw and then publish it. For this, he's often called the first real scientist.

    Well, if it's used horizontally as in looking in the distance, to me it's not a telescope but a spotting scope. Yes others built tubes with lenses at a fixed distance, but none of them looked up.

    That to me is what makes it a telescope.
    “The basic tool for the manipulation of reality is the manipulation of words. If you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use the words."
    --Philip K. Dick

  9. #629
    "Island Bartender" KG4CGC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    EM84ru, Easley SC
    Posts
    51,304
    It actually slowed down on the rain and stopped for a couple of days. Road crews are out all over the place moving dirt back into place and packing it down. So many trees fell over that all you could do was cut them up and wait for the rain to stop before hauling off the wood and filling the holes in. Sections of roads were getting wiped out around buried cement pipes that were overwhelmed by saturated soil conditions. There are a lot of places where normal rain isn't an issue but due to daily flash flooding were pushed to their limit.
    It rained so much on the Blue Ridge Parkway that roads were literally splitting apart from where the soil was escaping and there was nothing to support the asphalt.

  10. #630
    Istanbul Expert N2NH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Catskills
    Posts
    22,361
    Quote Originally Posted by KG4CGC View Post
    It actually slowed down on the rain and stopped for a couple of days. Road crews are out all over the place moving dirt back into place and packing it down. So many trees fell over that all you could do was cut them up and wait for the rain to stop before hauling off the wood and filling the holes in. Sections of roads were getting wiped out around buried cement pipes that were overwhelmed by saturated soil conditions. There are a lot of places where normal rain isn't an issue but due to daily flash flooding were pushed to their limit.
    It rained so much on the Blue Ridge Parkway that roads were literally splitting apart from where the soil was escaping and there was nothing to support the asphalt.
    Hope that it all gets fixed and that things start clearing up. We had a day of rain Sunday, but thankfully not much else for nearly three weeks. We could use some time to dry out here too. The lower tier and this area was just told by Guv. Cuomo that they're getting screwed out of flood aid. It is now being sent to the Capitol district area around Albany, NY instead.
    “The basic tool for the manipulation of reality is the manipulation of words. If you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use the words."
    --Philip K. Dick

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •