Page 10 of 10 FirstFirst ... 8910
Results 91 to 96 of 96

Thread: Does the Earth circle the sun?

  1. #91
    Orca Whisperer N1LAF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Ledyard, CT
    Posts
    13,949
    Quote Originally Posted by n2ize View Post
    Now for a better question. Does the earth move under my feet ?
    You have to define a reference point now

    ;)

  2. #92
    Orca Whisperer N1LAF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Ledyard, CT
    Posts
    13,949
    Quote Originally Posted by n2ize View Post
    You are missing the entire point that I am making. What I am trying to point out is is that your definition of a circular path is not entirely correct since there are numerous simple closed curves (other than circles) that fit the criteria you described. The equation for area and circumference of a circle are not entirely relevant to this discussion since to describe planetary motion we would be more interested in examining position vectors expressed in parametric form (i.e. vector equations).. In the plane we would be looking at equations that approximate an elliptical orbit and, if we are to consider the motion of the plane through 3-space we would have to add additional parameters

    In answer to your question no, the formulas don't apply if the orbital path in the plane is non-circular (elliptical). But assuming it were actually circular since you can have a circular path in 3-space and any circle in 3-space can be defined in terms of a 2-dimensional subspace (i.e a projection) . Think of it in terms of the earth orbiting the sun in a plane and envision the plane in motion through space.In terms of vectors the path of the planet in the plane would be a component of the vector equations for it's position in space.

    Said differently, for an observer standing somewhere out in space the position of a given planet at some time "t" would be given by a set of parametric (vector) equations. The 2-dimensional motion in the plane would be a component of those equations i.e. the projection of that motion onto some plane subspace of 3-space.
    At the end of the day, the planetary orbits are actually a corkscrew motion, not circular, in an absolute galactic coordinate system

  3. #93
    Orca Whisperer
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Posts
    22,593
    Quote Originally Posted by N1LAF View Post
    At the end of the day, the planetary orbits are actually a corkscrew motion, not circular, in an absolute galactic coordinate system
    Well, as seen from 0,0,0 Milky Way; it's not a corkscrew. It'd be a speeding forwards, then slowing down, speeding forwards, then slowing down, with a slight waver in it's path :)
    Big Giant Meteor 2020 - We need to make Earth Great Again

    http://www.coreyreichle.com

  4. #94
    Orca Whisperer N2RJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    13,863
    Quote Originally Posted by N1LAF View Post
    At the end of the day, the planetary orbits are actually a corkscrew motion, not circular, in an absolute galactic coordinate system
    I would like to see the reasoning behind that.

  5. #95
    Orca Whisperer
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Posts
    22,593
    Quote Originally Posted by N1LAF View Post
    At the end of the day, the planetary orbits are actually a corkscrew motion, not circular, in an absolute galactic coordinate system
    And, which Galactic Coordinate System? The standard one, uses Sol as it's 0,0,0
    Big Giant Meteor 2020 - We need to make Earth Great Again

    http://www.coreyreichle.com

  6. #96
    Orca Whisperer n2ize's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Crestwood, New York
    Posts
    33,899
    Quote Originally Posted by N1LAF View Post
    At the end of the day, the planetary orbits are actually a corkscrew motion, not circular, in an absolute galactic coordinate system
    I am fully aware of that. That is what I wrote above. The only thing I was attempting to do was to better define "circle" or "circular path" in terms of closed curves. Regardless of whether we are talking about astronomy it still boils down to Mathematics and the principles of analytical geometry and coordinate systems and transformations. A component of the "corkscrew motion" you are describing is the elliptical motion of planets in the plane. To an observer in the plane the planet moves in an elliptical orbit Now if we take that plane of planetary motion and move it through space (lets say in a straight line perpendicular to the plane of motion for simplicity) an observer at some reference point (origin) in space would observe (say off to the side somewhere would observe a spiral (corkscrew path). Now if that observer were to be smart enough to write down the equations of that corkscrew path the planar path would be a component of that motion.

    An analogy would be I am riding a bicycle at night in a straight line path while twirling a flashlight in a plane perpendicular to the direction I am riding. To me sitting on the bicycle I am moving with the flashlights plane of motion and to me it traces out a circular path in a plane. But if you are sitting on a bench observing me riding past the path of the light to your frame of reference is a corkscrew path. the planar motion of the light as I twirl it is a component of that corkscrew.

    I am not trying to criticize your example. Matter of fact I like this example because when we think of planetary motion we often only think only of the elliptical orbit in the plane (as if the plane were stationary) as opposed to the frame of reference of a point in space in which it is moving in the plane as the plane of motion is hurtling through space.
    I keep my 2 feet on the ground, and my head in the twilight zone.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •