I am fully aware of that. That is what I wrote above. The only thing I was attempting to do was to better define "circle" or "circular path" in terms of closed curves. Regardless of whether we are talking about astronomy it still boils down to Mathematics and the principles of analytical geometry and coordinate systems and transformations. A component of the "corkscrew motion" you are describing is the elliptical motion of planets in the plane. To an observer in the plane the planet moves in an elliptical orbit Now if we take that plane of planetary motion and move it through space (lets say in a straight line perpendicular to the plane of motion for simplicity) an observer at some reference point (origin) in space would observe (say off to the side somewhere would observe a spiral (corkscrew path). Now if that observer were to be smart enough to write down the equations of that corkscrew path the planar path would be a component of that motion.
An analogy would be I am riding a bicycle at night in a straight line path while twirling a flashlight in a plane perpendicular to the direction I am riding. To me sitting on the bicycle I am moving with the flashlights plane of motion and to me it traces out a circular path in a plane. But if you are sitting on a bench observing me riding past the path of the light to your frame of reference is a corkscrew path. the planar motion of the light as I twirl it is a component of that corkscrew.
I am not trying to criticize your example. Matter of fact I like this example because when we think of planetary motion we often only think only of the elliptical orbit in the plane (as if the plane were stationary) as opposed to the frame of reference of a point in space in which it is moving in the plane as the plane of motion is hurtling through space.
I keep my 2 feet on the ground, and my head in the twilight zone.