It's the Radioshack htx-10.I haven't got my htx-100 yet.All it's got is a fine tuning knob.
It's the Radioshack htx-10.I haven't got my htx-100 yet.All it's got is a fine tuning knob.
If you're getting lousy signal reports, you're probably on frequency ok. If you were off, you'd be told about it because you'd be mostly unintelligible. If you have a really low antenna, or a lot of loss in the antenna/transmission line combo, you'll get lousy reports. Also, except for one or two days recently, 10m has been pretty much a dead zone. MUF hasn't been that high.
When the government's boot is on your throat, whether it is a left boot or a right boot is of no consequence. — GARY LLOYD
The nation we live in is the nation we have built by design, each successive generation raising the wall of tyranny a little higher. - Chris Griffin
I finally got my htx-100.It seems to tune in to the transmittinf frequency better. After a day of use I did the mic mod for higher mic gain seems to work better.
IMO, the '100 was the better rig. Its RF/AF board is similar to the HR-2510/2600, albeit with a better SSB filtering scheme.
I made a bunch of mobile contacts with my HR-series rigs throughout the late 80s into the 90s...and afterwards pressed them into service in a multiport packet radio BBS/gateway. They ran nonstop for over 10 years without a failure.
"Everyone wants to be an AM Gangsta until it's time to start doing AM Gangsta shit."
Was the station DX?
If so, he may have been expecting stations calling him to be furthur offset from his frequency.
(Was he operating Spread Spectrum?) ;)