amazing aint it.Originally Posted by W3WN
amazing aint it.
I AM THE VOICE OF THE VOICELESS!
With a last name of Drinkard, no less...
Yeah, I noticed that too.
I keep my 2 feet on the ground, and my head in the twilight zone.
Yes, i agree. At first I thought "baby Girl" referred to the infant. Then I realized that IS the woman's name !! It was bad enough when I was very little (about 2 or 3 years old) and one of my uncles always used to call me "Baby John". Not only did I hate being called that but one of my aunts also hated that name so much she used to get infuriated when she heard him call me that.... She used to hollar "STOP CALLING HIM THAT STUPID NAME !!".
I keep my 2 feet on the ground, and my head in the twilight zone.
Yep.
Adults over 18 want to use drugs and won't be a burden on society? Have at it.
But kids should be protected from your inability to take care of them due to your drug habit... no need to ruin two or more lives.
I don't want to pay for it. I'm sick of all the welfare prince and princesses, who don't work, and think they can have the state take care of them, just because they picked horrible parents.
Let them mop and clean at schools...
amazing aint it.The only thing missing from making this the classic stereotype, is that this didn't happen in WV, TN, AL, or MS.Yeah, I noticed that too.
Last edited by KJ3N; 03-13-2012 at 03:05 PM.
"People Who Don't Want Their Beliefs Laughed at Shouldn't Have Such Funny Beliefs" -AD5MB
"If someone tells you he believes in and talks to an invisible bunny named Harvey, you put him on medication and a regimen of therapy. If someone tells you he believes in and talks to God, well, that's perfectly acceptable. Why that's the case is impossible for me to fathom." - WP2XX
Latest ClubLog entries.
In fact the wealthier one is the less of a burden they are. There's plenty of hard drug use on Wall Street, in America's upper class neighborhoods or well to do suburban neighborhoods. However, among those socio-economics classes it moves relatively unnoticed because people in those brackets can afford to keep it very discreet and, law enforcement rarely peeks into those circles.
Depends on what you mean by "ruining lives" ? Growing up is tough regardless and there is going to be good and bad parenting. It can be argued that smoking around children can "ruin" their lives and so can drinking. So can parents who drive too fast. Or parents that serve their kids to much junk food. I have seen parents who were overly religious or overly strict "ruin" kids lives. There have been cases where kids have been taken from parents because the parents smoked weed and the kids lives were "ruined" (or should we say negatively impacted) from the action of the nanny state taking the kids away from these "negligent parents" .. Yet two doors down you have alcoholic parents beating their kids but that's okay.But kids should be protected from your inability to take care of them due to your drug habit... no need to ruin two or more lives.
I keep my 2 feet on the ground, and my head in the twilight zone.
Thank God for Reagan. he exposed all those "welfare queens". You know, the ones who have 30+ kids and they collect 100 different welfare checks and they have millions socked away in the bank and they drive Rolls Royce and Caddy's made of gold, yet amidst all that extreme wealth they chose to remain living in Camden or Detroit.
I keep my 2 feet on the ground, and my head in the twilight zone.
hey its Indiana its close enough...
were a mix of the south and the northeast.
I AM THE VOICE OF THE VOICELESS!
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote