Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: would linux work on an old pentium III with 512 meg memory?

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    State of Americisraelia
    Posts
    11,306

    would linux work on an old pentium III with 512 meg memory?

    ?????????????????????????????

  2. #2
    Administrator ad4mg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    14,845
    Quote Originally Posted by kc7jty View Post
    ?????????????????????????????
    Yes! There are several flavors of Linux geared towards older machines like this. I am running Ubuntu 9.04 on a very old 750 MHz machine with 512 MB of RAM. Xubuntu is designed for these older machines, and uses the XFCE desktop instead of the more resource hungry Gnome or KDE desktops. There are other distros available, like Puppy Linux, but I haven't toyed with them. Xubuntu is a very capable OS, but don't expect blazing speed from a P-III machine!
    QAnon / GOP Republicans mentally lack the necessary intelligence to even tell a decent lie (Ex: A cabal of Satanic, cannibalistic pedophiles run a global child sex trafficking ring and conspired against former President Dotard dRUMPf during his term in office... Jewish space lasers, etc.). What in the hell makes anyone believe these melon heads can actually govern?

  3. #3
    Pope Carlo l NQ6U's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Maritime Mobile
    Posts
    29,890
    I agree with Luke--avoid Ubuntu/Kubuntu on your older machine. They use a compositing graphics display engine that really eats up processing power. Xubuntu will work, as will Puppy Linux which I have run on a 500MHz AMD K2 machine with 512MB of RAM.
    All the world’s a stage, but obviously the play is unrehearsed and everybody is ad-libbing his lines. Maybe that’s why it’s hard to tell if we’re living in a tragedy or a farce.

  4. #4
    Orca Whisperer n2ize's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Crestwood, New York
    Posts
    33,899
    basically any Linux will work in text mode on an older/weaker machine. However, you'll need to run a plain vanilla window manager. Nothing fancy like what comes bundled with KDE, etc. Twm might be a good choice for older hardware.
    I keep my 2 feet on the ground, and my head in the twilight zone.

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    State of Americisraelia
    Posts
    11,306
    tnx, my windows xp on it is so slow with all the security crap running. If I lose the hard drive, or get a killer Trojan I'll switch.

  6. #6
    Administrator ad4mg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    14,845
    Quote Originally Posted by kc7jty View Post
    tnx, my windows xp on it is so slow with all the security crap running. If I lose the hard drive, or get a killer Trojan I'll switch.
    That's the beauty of linux ... you don't need the security stuff. Viruses and malware written for windows just won't run in linux, and there are amazingly few written for linux. Just avoid running as "root" (similar to administrator in Windows), and you're good to go. The Ubuntu distributions don't even activate the root account by default. System commands are run using "sudo", which is "super user", and it requires your password.

    There is somewhat of a learning curve involved. Most mainstream linux distributions are probably 95% plug and play, but hardware support isn't quite there yet, mostly due to hardware manufacturers refusing to write linux drivers.
    QAnon / GOP Republicans mentally lack the necessary intelligence to even tell a decent lie (Ex: A cabal of Satanic, cannibalistic pedophiles run a global child sex trafficking ring and conspired against former President Dotard dRUMPf during his term in office... Jewish space lasers, etc.). What in the hell makes anyone believe these melon heads can actually govern?

  7. #7
    Forum Addict n6hcm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    FN13wb
    Posts
    2,822
    absolutely ... you could even get a gui on something like this (although you'd have to choose a slimmer window manager).
    "... and another thing about you democrats ... you all believe in science!" -- denny crane

  8. #8
    Whacker Knot WØTKX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Lakewood, CO
    Posts
    26,758
    We run a flavor of Redhat with tweaks on around 80 PC's used as tolling controllers.

    60 or so are 486's. :shock:

    They control the signaling when traffic runs across the loops... reading RF transponder data from subscribers, axle counts, camera triggering, etc. These peripheral devices send data back to the PC, data is then kept locally for a short bit of time. Depending on the amount of traffic expected at a location, data tables are sucked up via polling from a squad of bigass a (Windows 8) servers. It is a lot of data. Can you say layered flavors of SQL? Sure, I knew you could.

    At the (slower toll) ramps they are all 486 "industrial" PC's. No GUI, but a whole page of really weird stuff for our devices rolls by on bootup. Lousy humans need pictures and a mouse. :roll:

    Much beefier and faster PC's are used at the (high speed toll) main lanes, but it's still the same command line interface. The custom applications do have HTML pages to manage most of the devices and cameras.

    So a typical session working with one means you plug into the network locally with a laptop, then login via putty and HTML. While watching the physical display on the controller PC if you have to do a cold boot.

    Pumping all those graphics for a user interface just isn't needed, 90% of commands run on them are to load and unload our "special stuff" when repairs or testing is done... not that many are really Linux OS commands. Don't even bother (or need) to reboot, usually.

    The tolling cameras run embedded Linux on flash hardware, BTW.
    "Where would we be without the agitators of the world to attach the electrodes
    of knowledge to the nipples of ignorance?" ~ Professor "Dick" Soloman



  9. #9
    Orca Whisperer n2ize's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Crestwood, New York
    Posts
    33,899
    I have an older Linux box down in the basement that runs 24/7/365. It runs an older version of Fedora (ver 5 I think) and it provides a number of local and worldwide network services, i.e. router, web server, mailbox, proxy server, DNS, Fax Server, and more. Runs constantly and never crashes. Linux is very stable. Doubt I'd get that kind of mileage on a Windows box. Which reminds me, I need to do some preventative maintenance. I want to shut it down give it a cleaning, backup and replace the drives. maybe even update the OS.
    I keep my 2 feet on the ground, and my head in the twilight zone.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •