Idiots

I guess we can't all be as lucky as Jed Clampett.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by w2amr

I just don't GET killing any animal for fun.
Other than the deer kicking his ass, The highlight of the video was when the moron sprayed elk urine in his mouth. wonder if he tongue kisses the little woman when he returns from the hunt.:yuck:

---

I don't get it either, but the phenomenon exists, and I do know some fb people who hunt. They seem to be respnsible for 78% of the world's annual production of venison sausage, and it's better they get the deer than to have the poor things beaten to death by irate Italian grandmothers for nibbling on the tomatos and eggplant (nobody worries about the zucchini, there's always too much zucchini).

The dude on the tube was a boob. The elk urine in the mouth, the neckerchief during the indoor part of the interview, all of it points to a true nimrod-retard.

73,

Anybody wonder why there is such a shortage of the most popular calibers?
Sure they blame it on war efforts etc BUT that just doesn't seem quite right.

Government stockpiles of ammunition, probably vacuum packed and stored for contingency since before we were born....

Of course "Gubmint" doesn't have to worry about the right to bear arms if nobody can find ammunition.

Quote:

---

the neckerchief during the indoor part of the interview

---

Rudy could explain that. He knows neckerchief and bandana etiquette, how they are worn and what the meanings are for the different ways they are worn.

I wonder if elk and deer can crossbreed?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by W5GA

I paid very close attention to your post. You apparently suffer from a common misconception, and that is that just because an animal is shot that they immediately tip over and die. Taint so, and never has been. I've seen (gun) heart shot deer run a mile, and I've seen arrowed deer tip over on the spot. And the converse is also true. Just because he's using a bow doesn't make it a cruel and lingering death. As with a gun, bad placement is what guarantees that. Placement is everything.

---

And a quick kill is much more likely with a gun. That is NOT a misconception, it's common sense.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by w2amr

And a quick kill is much more likely with a gun. That is NOT a misconception, it's common sense.

---

And you're 100% wrong.

I don't think it would be very pleasant getting shot with either one.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by w2amr

I don't think it would be very pleasant getting shot with either one.

---

How about in comparison with being killed by wolves or other predators? Or dying of starvation or disease? Those are the typical ways a deer in the wild would die. In the real world, life in the woods ain't nothing like it's depicted in Bambi.

Sorry Slappy, I never read Bambi.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by W5GA

And you're 100% wrong.

---

You may forget that there are people on here who know a little bit about the subject. It is amazing how all the deer hunters I knew disagreed with that. Some hunters I talked to would shoot an arrow and say that maybe a blade of grass would redirect the arrow and they would have a gutshot rather than a headshot. They would have been able to get a second shot off with a 30-06 but no chance with an arrow. So the deer would go off into the forest and get lost and die.