Can you show us this data produced by reputable institutions? Because, as of yet; you haven't.Quote:
Originally Posted by PA5COR
Printable View
Can you show us this data produced by reputable institutions? Because, as of yet; you haven't.Quote:
Originally Posted by PA5COR
Max Planck institute for a start?
WHat reputable sources outside the WHO and IAEA you produce? ;)
http://www.ans.org/misc/FukushimaSpe...-Caracappa.pdfQuote:
Originally Posted by PA5COR
For starters...
However, it is YOU who are making the claim that all radiation is dangerous, and we should never be exposed to a level over 0. So, it is up to YOU to prove your point.
All I need to do is poke holes in the statements you make.
Poke holes with irrefutable proof then if you want to put that standard upon someone else obide by it too.
The IAEA themselves have stated that all radiation is dangerous.
See thread above.
Come up with a report published on June 28 2011 with data from before that date? weak, this is still an ongoing event, and the data for releasd radio isotopes and noble gasses have been corrected upwards by the TEPCO as stated above in my posts, so the study you come up with is based on old faulty data.
I love the smell of free neutrons in the morning.
I rather smell the fresh ground coffee running ;)
I don't think anyone ever denied that radiation can be dangerous. Did you read what I wrote about safe levels as a measure of probability. Few things in life are absolute and in "yes/no", "safe/unsafe",etc. Probability was invented to help us to try and answer questions for which there is/was no absolute answer. The vast majority of thinggs we decide upon in real life as based on probability as opposed to absolutes. Even an intuitive sense of probability tells us a lot more than an absolute which cannot be determined. . There is no absolute measure of safety with tobacco. One single puff of a cigarette only once may cause fatal cancer. But the probability is extremely low so we deem it safe to take one puff. There is no such thing as a safe commercial airliner, it is possible to be killed on any given flight. But the probability of a catastrophie is low enough where we consider air travel to be safe. A single alpha particle or burst of gamma radiation may be enough to induce a fatal cancer. So yes, in a purely absolute sense there is no safe level. Even normal background radiation may kill you. But the probability is very low so, we generally consider it safe..Quote:
Originally Posted by PA5COR
These were not unbiased peer reviewed academic reports.Quote:
Come up with a report published on June 28 2011 with data from before that date? weak, this is still an ongoing event, and the data for releasd radio isotopes and noble gasses have been corrected upwards by the TEPCO as stated above in my posts, so the study you come up with is based on old faulty data.
Along with cadmium, arsenic and lead? (used to make solar cells)Quote:
Originally Posted by PA5COR
These were not unbiased peer reviewed academic reports
And wrong to be quoted for old data as well, putting the bomb under the peer reciewed reports isn't it?
I don't grind solar cells in my coffee ;)Quote:
Along with cadmium, arsenic and lead? (used to make solar cells)