PDA

View Full Version : Wendy Williams' Outrageous Suggestion: "Saddle that Man With A Miscreant"



koØm
05-10-2014, 01:31 PM
According to Wendy Williams, it is OK for a woman to trick a man into an unwanted pregnancy; she said this on nation-wide / syndicated television.

She should be censured.

BTW: If, you are offended by the raw truth, don't start the video and, if you do, don't be offended, he's talking to *me* and not to *you*.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYM4MrLkME8

.

NQ6U
05-10-2014, 02:23 PM
She should be censured for her incorrect use of the word miscreant.


miscreant |ˈmiskrēənt|

noun
a person who behaves badly or in a way that breaks the law.
• archaic a heretic.

adjective
(of a person) behaving badly or in a way that breaks a law or rule : her miscreant husband.
• archaic heretical.

ORIGIN Middle English (as an adjective in the sense [disbelieving] ): from Old French mescreant, present participle of mescreire ‘disbelieve,’ from mes- ‘mis-’ + creire ‘believe’ (from Latin credere).

WØTKX
05-10-2014, 03:00 PM
http://img.perezhilton.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/wendy-williams-could-have-ended-up-like-whitney-houston__oPt.jpg

http://37.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lzx7p8mqRG1qis6pso4_1280.jpg

http://missjia.com/images/2011/11/wendy-williams.jpg

W3WN
05-10-2014, 03:06 PM
Who or what is Wendy Williams, and why should we give a sh... care in the slightest what she has to say about anything?

WØTKX
05-10-2014, 03:16 PM
Wendy "O" Williams of the Plasmatics was much better. :yes:

koØm
05-10-2014, 03:41 PM
12251

Miscreant: The unexpected and typically unwanted fruits of unprotected sexual intercouse, in particular, children born to unwed parents.

But, let's not quibble over "terms" and minor details, what she is advocating is Dishonesty in a marital relationship which will end up ensnaring the unsuspecting husband in the child support system.

If you have been there, then you know; if you haven't been there then, by all means possible stay out of their system.

Some might say, "Wendy Who and what should we listen to anything she has to say?" My answer is: If you don't know then you are not part of the mainstream "Target Demographics" who makes purchases of items sponsored on her show; you are not one of the "bleeders and breeders".

.

W9JEF
05-10-2014, 09:00 PM
.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

http://qvj.chadwyck.com/images/QVcoronation.jpg

W3WN
05-10-2014, 11:38 PM
Wendy "O" Williams of the Plasmatics was much better. :yes:THAT Wendy Williams I remember.

No idea whom this other bimbo is.

N2NH
05-11-2014, 01:57 PM
With the target audience that she has, mostly women, I doubt if anything has changed. They already believe this. Asked the XYL for verification. She agrees.

You'd be surprised what passes for entertainment between 9AM and 4PM. This is pretty tame.
Glad to not be the OP. I'm not allowed to mention this kind of stuff.

AC8KF WALT
05-11-2014, 05:50 PM
entertainment for the masses of babies mamas.

kb2vxa
05-12-2014, 05:43 PM
Women talk for the sake of talking and watch TV with women talking for the sake of talking. Then they talk about what they heard women talking about on TV. It keeps them entertained and wasting time better spent cooking and cleaning... DOING USEFUL HOUSEWORK!

N2NH
05-13-2014, 01:38 AM
The thing I find is that women have some interesting variations of the rules.

For instance, in the early '70s, I remember being told that televisions image of women was defined by men and that if women had the chance, it would look nothing like what I saw on the 3 networks. Then came Lifetime TV and 40 years later, what I see is exactly the same as what that 1970s television image of women was.

So, what's the difference that they're not in arms? Very little except that it's acceptable now that it's on Lifetime TV.

koØm
05-13-2014, 07:25 AM
Women talk for the sake of talking and watch TV with women talking for the sake of talking. Then they talk about what they heard women talking about on TV. It keeps them entertained and wasting time better spent cooking and cleaning... DOING USEFUL HOUSEWORK!



.......Then came Lifetime TV and 40 years later, what I see is exactly the same as what that 1970s television image of women was.......


So, what's the difference that they're not in arms? Very little except that it's acceptable now that it's on Lifetime TV.

I guess that you could say that my sister-in-law is very impressionable, my brother comes home from work and, his wife is pissed off at him for seemingly no reason; she spends the whole day watching Lifetime and when he gets home, she transfers all the hostility and turmoil from Lifetime to him as if he has done something to her.

.

N2NH
05-14-2014, 11:21 AM
I guess that you could say that my sister-in-law is very impressionable, my brother comes home from work and, his wife is pissed off at him for seemingly no reason; she spends the whole day watching Lifetime and when he gets home, she transfers all the hostility and turmoil from Lifetime to him as if he has done something to her.

.

I have seen that happen with a lot of women who watch lifetime. I can only direct you to a posting about this TABOO subject on another message site...

A quick quote then a link.


Well - my teen-ager refers to it as the 'man-hating' channel. So, that's definitely the perception. I rarely watch it.

Read more: http://www.city-data.com/forum/politics-other-controversies/1687653-lifetime-television-sexist-independent-crime-stereotypes.html#ixzz31hvoZx2h


Oh, and a link to a search that might put it in perspective... Here. (http://www.bing.com/search?q=lifetime+the+man+hating+channel&pc=MOZI) A slight image problem. Cure? Block Lifetime.