PDA

View Full Version : Very good quality Cvil War photos



TESLA
04-30-2012, 02:11 PM
Amazing photos:


http://www.theatlantic.com/infocus/2012/02/the-civil-war-part-1-the-places/100241/


http://www.theatlantic.com/infocus/2012/02/the-civil-war-part-2-the-people/100242/


http://www.theatlantic.com/infocus/2012/02/the-civil-war-part-3-the-stereographs/100243/

N2RJ
04-30-2012, 02:20 PM
Ahem... "The war of northern aggression" :lol:

KG4CGC
04-30-2012, 02:32 PM
Amazing photos:


http://www.theatlantic.com/infocus/2012/02/the-civil-war-part-1-the-places/100241/


http://www.theatlantic.com/infocus/2012/02/the-civil-war-part-2-the-people/100242/


http://www.theatlantic.com/infocus/2012/02/the-civil-war-part-3-the-stereographs/100243/
Very nice links.
Thank you for sharing them.

W2NAP
04-30-2012, 02:32 PM
amazing photos indeed

TESLA
04-30-2012, 02:38 PM
I know they are not radio related but I just spent two hours with my family looking at and talking about those photos. Hard to believe it was just a short 150 years ago. This is not about winners or losers, it's about history. Glad you like them.

W3WN
04-30-2012, 02:43 PM
Amazing photos:

http://www.theatlantic.com/infocus/2012/02/the-civil-war-part-1-the-places/100241/
http://www.theatlantic.com/infocus/2012/02/the-civil-war-part-2-the-people/100242/
http://www.theatlantic.com/infocus/2012/02/the-civil-war-part-3-the-stereographs/100243/Very nice.

W3WN
04-30-2012, 02:50 PM
Ahem... "The war of northern aggression" :lol:Isn't it a little late to be taking sides? :evil:

At the time of the, ah, unpleasantness, my great-etc.-grandparents were being opppressed by the Czar, so I have no stake in the matter!

kf0rt
04-30-2012, 02:51 PM
Isn't it a little late to be taking sides? :evil:


"The South shall rise again!"

K7SGJ
04-30-2012, 02:58 PM
Yes, thanks for posting the links. The Civil War has always been of interest to me, at least in later life. Like most school age kids, history was of little interest, and getting out to play baseball was all that was on my mind. I am always amazed at the amount of destruction that occurred during that war. Imagine the carnage and devastation that would have happened with the weapons of today. Of particular interest were the ironclads, amazing vessels. And Andersonville, what a hell on earth.

W3WN
04-30-2012, 03:03 PM
"The South shall rise again!"Just takes a little yeast. Except during Passover.

N2RJ
04-30-2012, 03:35 PM
I always marvel at how photographers back then who took photos for serious purposes took time to take photos that were beautiful and artistic.

Today everyone just goes out with a digital camera and just goes snap snap snap and the pictures are boring and bland.

kf0rt
04-30-2012, 03:49 PM
I always marvel at how photographers back then who took photos for serious purposes took time to take photos that were beautiful and artistic.

Today everyone just goes out with a digital camera and just goes snap snap snap and the pictures are boring and bland.

Back then, if you took pictures at all, you were doing it for "serious purposes." Shooting on glass plates wasn't easy.

As for boring and bland -- yeah a lot of it is just that (comes from everyone having access). But the professionals today are better than ever and the tools have never been better.

NQ6U
04-30-2012, 03:59 PM
At the time of the, ah, unpleasantness, my great-etc.-grandparents were being opppressed by the Czar, so I have no stake in the matter!

Same here, only mine were in Sicily, no doubt trying to escape the attentions of the Arma dei carabinieri. They didn't arrive in the U.S. until about twenty years after the Civil War.

KK4AMI
04-30-2012, 04:02 PM
Back then, if you took pictures at all, you were doing it for "serious purposes." Shooting on glass plates wasn't easy.

As for boring and bland -- yeah a lot of it is just that (comes from everyone having access). But the professionals today are better than ever and the tools have never been better.

I have a strange collection of antique cameras including two Blair Cameras (one box and one view camera) from that era. I have the glass plates. I used to get a can of spray B&W emulsion to coat the plates then put them in their holders. It was fun making 4x5 plates then just contact printing them for an antique look with sepia toner. Now they sit on my shelf collecting dust. I don't even know if they make the emulsion anymore. Maybe I'll get a 4x5 digital back :)

kf0rt
04-30-2012, 05:02 PM
I have a strange collection of antique cameras including two Blair Cameras (one box and one view camera) from that era. I have the glass plates. I used to get a can of spray B&W emulsion to coat the plates then put them in their holders. It was fun making 4x5 plates then just contact printing them for an antique look with sepia toner. Now they sit on my shelf collecting dust. I don't even know if they make the emulsion anymore. Maybe I'll get a 4x5 digital back :)

Good luck finding a banker to fund that 4x5 digital back. ;)

I'm not seeing anything in a brief search for spray emulsion, but liquid emulsion is still pretty widely available (it's positive, not negative however, and rather expensive). Interesting stuff, but as a "snapper of the bland and boring" I'll be okay if I never smell Dektol again.

Here's a short article on the process used during the Civil War: http://www.civilwar.org/photos/3d-photography-special/photography-and-the-civil-war.html

There's even a non-profit organization devoted to Civil War photography: http://www.civilwarphotography.org/

Fascinating stuff. Beyond the "artistry" I'm amazed at how good the exposure and focus is on many of these. B&W photography 100 years later wasn't much better.

NQ6U
04-30-2012, 05:13 PM
You can always make your own emulsion. Here's one site (http://www.costaricacoffeeart.com/photo_emulsion_how_to_make_it_yourself.php) that has step-by-step instructions; I didn't pay close attention so I don't know how good they are but, if that site is lacking, there are others out there. Just Google "make photo emulsion."

KK4AMI
04-30-2012, 05:45 PM
Good luck finding a banker to fund that 4x5 digital back. ;)

I'm not seeing anything in a brief search for spray emulsion, but liquid emulsion is still pretty widely available (it's positive, not negative however, and rather expensive). Interesting stuff, but as a "snapper of the bland and boring" I'll be okay if I never smell Dektol again.

Here's a short article on the process used during the Civil War: http://www.civilwar.org/photos/3d-photography-special/photography-and-the-civil-war.html

There's even a non-profit organization devoted to Civil War photography: http://www.civilwarphotography.org/

Fascinating stuff. Beyond the "artistry" I'm amazed at how good the exposure and focus is on many of these. B&W photography 100 years later wasn't much better.

Big agreement on ever smelling Kodak chemicals again. With the advent of digital photography it wasn't just gays that came out of the closet.

ka4dpo
04-30-2012, 07:53 PM
Great pictures but those dummies trying to cross the Patomac at Georgetown on a ferry were dumb as wood. The key bridge is just up the road...

N2RJ
05-01-2012, 09:18 AM
But the professionals today are better than ever and the tools have never been better.

Yep. I know this (have some of the tools myself). :)