I'm an Inuet

(to the tune, "the Lion Sleeps")

I'm an Inuet, an Inuet, an Inuet, an Inuet, an Inuet, an Inuet, an Inuet, an Inuet...

On the Tundra, the frozen Tundra, McGraw drills oil tonight
On the Tundra, the effin cold Tundra, McGraw drills oil tonight

I'm an Inuet, an Inuet, an Inuet, an Inuet, an Inuet, an Inuet, an Inuet, an Inuet...

They will pillage, their peaceful pillage, to drill oil out tonight
They will pillage, their so-kind pillage, to drill oil out tonight

I'm an Inuet, an Inuet, an Inuet, an Inuet, an Inuet, an Inuet, an Inuet, an Inuet...

Flush and snarlin', don't fear wolves' snarlin', We're drillin' oil tonight.
Flush and snarlin', smile at wolves' snarlin', We're drillin' oil tonight.

I'm an Inuet, an Inuet, an Inuet, an Inuet, an Inuet, an Inuet, an Inuet, an Inuet...

[kf0rt]

Speakin' of which... where the hell is McGraw?

[WV6Z]

Quick Draw or Dave?

[ad4mg]

Speakin' of which... where the hell is McGraw?

He was a casualty of "The Forbidden Zone - Politics and Religion". He told me he had lost interest in the site. :quiet

[kf0rt]

Speakin' of which... where the hell is McGraw?

He was a casualty of "The Forbidden Zone - Politics and Religion". He told me he had lost interest in the site. :quiet

It's a shame the RP stuff got to him. IOMH did in a few weeks what the Zed couldn't in several years? I'm somehow disappointed. I miss his fiercely independent view. :(

[WV6Z]

Wow, that's almost hard to believe. I figured I would have actually gotten a life and left here long before Dave. He seemed to enjoy the shyte fest here in the Forbidden Zone, or so I thought..... I was obviously wrong.

He could have avoided that area for the most part as I do, but, I suppose if it's that near and dear to you, as it was to Dave, how can you avoid your favorite sand box?

Oh well, at least you guys had enough sense to not have a religion thread, even though, IMHO, the politics thread is just as big of a mistake. Wanna piss of friends and alienate yourself from others? Well you guys know the rest......

[kc2orw]

Well I like Dave even if I don't like RP and might have disagreed with him on that. I really don't see much disagreement with him beyond that.
But perhaps he is right and the respite will do him some good, I will likely do the same soon enough. There are things I need to attend to and that will probably make me scarce here and at the zed.

[N3ATS]

Oh well, at least you guys had enough sense to not have a religion thread, even though, IMHO, the politics thread is just as big of a mistake. Wanna piss of friends and alienate yourself from others? Well you guys know the rest......


I just try to remember not to take things personally. I give it, I take it, but I hold no animosity towards anyone personally. Just words on a screen bro'.

I've been somewhat stressed lately, so if I come off like a d***, it's nothing personal.

[kc2orw]

Oh well, at least you guys had enough sense to not have a religion thread, even though, IMHO, the politics thread is just as big of a mistake. Wanna piss of friends and alienate yourself from others? Well you guys know the rest......


I just try to remember not to take things personally. I give it, I take it, but I hold no animosity towards anyone personally. Just words on a screen bro'.

I've been somewhat stressed lately, so if I come off like a d***, it's nothing personal.
That's quite alright Steve I try to ignore the worst of the comments as best I can. That could include never reading a thread again after I have made my final comment. Course I don't always telegraph when it is my final comment :lol:

Hmm... I wonder if Dave's last exchange with JYD had something to do with it... Something along the lines of "I paid into SS for more year then you have been alive and intend to get back what I paid in" nearly it but I would have to look at zed for an exact quote.

[N2NH]

Well it's beyond me. I rarely get too upset. In most of jobs I worked in, if you got stressed out or too emotional, you usually ended up fired or in jail, so I tend to have a fairly thick skin. When things got testy, it was always good to take some time off. Hopefully Dave will find that to be the case.

Lassie still thinks he's down a well (and if he reads that, he'll know what it means).
:D

[al2n]

Dave has been working with the RP campaign up here.

He will probably be back in action in a few weeks.

[nx6d]

I'm no fan of Ron Paul, but I think the blasting Dave is getting over RP is a bit much. sMarty and Commander McBragg (the Great Bloviator) and their motley crew of 4 landers NPO and SVA seem to go out of their way to lead the attack.

I'm apparently missing something, as I don't see why the so-called "conservatives" are panicked about RP, and why sMarty is leading the attack from the left. sMarty has especially been pretty nasty. Dave's a pretty thick skinned guy, but I could see where attacks by those two nimrods would get old on a daily basis. I don't think having JYD on Ron Paul's side is any asset either. The guy invites attacks with his simplistic view of the constitution and the world.

Come back to the 5 and Dime, Dave McGraw, Dave McGraw...It's not as much fun without you...

Dave NX6D
Modoc County, CA

[nx6d]

Oh well, at least you guys had enough sense to not have a religion thread, even though, IMHO, the politics thread is just as big of a mistake. Wanna piss of friends and alienate yourself from others? Well you guys know the rest......


I just try to remember not to take things personally. I give it, I take it, but I hold no animosity towards anyone personally. Just words on a screen bro'.

I've been somewhat stressed lately, so if I come off like a d***, it's nothing personal.

Excuse me for being culturally deficient, but who's the avatar, Steve?

[kf0rt]

Oh well, at least you guys had enough sense to not have a religion thread, even though, IMHO, the politics thread is just as big of a mistake. Wanna piss of friends and alienate yourself from others? Well you guys know the rest......


I just try to remember not to take things personally. I give it, I take it, but I hold no animosity towards anyone personally. Just words on a screen bro'.

I've been somewhat stressed lately, so if I come off like a d***, it's nothing personal.

Excuse me for being culturally deficient, but who's the avatar, Steve?

Just guessing here...


It's "Dimebag" Darrell Abbott.

[N3ATS]

I'm no fan of Ron Paul, but I think the blasting Dave is getting over RP is a bit much. sMarty and Commander McBragg (the Great Bloviator) and their motley crew of 4 landers NPO and SVA seem to go out of their way to lead the attack.

I'm apparently missing something, as I don't see why the so-called "conservatives" are panicked about RP, and why sMarty is leading the attack from the left. sMarty has especially been pretty nasty. Dave's a pretty thick skinned guy, but I could see where attacks by those two nimrods would get old on a daily basis. I don't think having JYD on Ron Paul's side is any asset either. The guy invites attacks with his simplistic view of the constitution and the world.

Come back to the 5 and Dime, Dave McGraw, Dave McGraw...It's not as much fun without you...

Dave NX6D
Modoc County, CA


Why are the "so-called" Conservatives panicked about RP? That's easy. No more globalization, nation building, war mongering, and everything else that is the Neo-Conservative agenda.

Right now, Marty is trying to convince people that Ron Paul and John McCain are tied for 3rd in Nevada and there is no 2nd place. How can there be a 3rd place, if there is no 2nd place???

http://www.qrz.com/ib-bin/ikonboard.cgi ... 1580;st=25 (http://www.qrz.com/ib-bin/ikonboard.cgi?s=4279f799b0f691b5c3ab610f418e6948;a ct=ST;f=17;t=181580;st=25)

The avatar is the late guitarist from Pantera, and most recently Damageplan (metal bands). Darrell "Dimebag" Abbott. He was killed on stage in Columbus, OH a while back, you'll probably recall.

[n2ize]

The avatar is the late guitarist from Pantera, and most recently Damageplan (metal bands). Darrell "Dimebag" Abbott. He was killed on stage in Columbus, OH a while back, you'll probably recall.

No. How was he killed ? Pray tell ?

[kf0rt]

According to der wiki:


On December 8, 2004, while performing with Damageplan at the Alrosa Villa in Columbus, Ohio, Dimebag Darrell Abbott was shot and killed onstage by Nathan Gale. Abbott was shot a total of five times, at point-blank range in the back of the head. He was 38 years old.

Three others were killed in the shooting: concert attendee Nathan Bray, 23 of Columbus; club employee Erin Halk, 29 of northwest Columbus; and Damageplan security guard Jeff "Mayhem" Thompson, 40 of Texas.

The band's drum technician, John "Kat" Brooks, and tour manager, Chris Paluska, were also injured.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimebag#Death

From Frozen Dave to Dimebag Darrel
Neither post here as much as a carol
"He's not a racist" he said of Paul
And the rest replied with "LAWL
Just as all new cars come equipped with a 4 barrel"

[N3ATS]

The avatar is the late guitarist from Pantera, and most recently Damageplan (metal bands). Darrell "Dimebag" Abbott. He was killed on stage in Columbus, OH a while back, you'll probably recall.

No. How was he killed ? Pray tell ?

Here comes the anti-gun rhetoric. I hope you're ready.

[WV6Z]

To find out more about Evil Guns, be sure to visit here.... http://www.vh1.com/movies/movie/55931/moviemain.jhtml

[KC8TCQ]

I almost went to that show in Columbus. I was already down there for a meeting with the state EMA.

There once was a ham lived in Texas
Represented the male of the sexes
A friend there knew Pantera
From that time and era
And all loved to eat Tex-Mex's

[M0GLO]

Guns don't kill people, assholes do.

[WV6Z]

Which is precisely why public nudity is a no-no. 8)

[kf0rt]

The avatar is the late guitarist from Pantera, and most recently Damageplan (metal bands). Darrell "Dimebag" Abbott. He was killed on stage in Columbus, OH a while back, you'll probably recall.

No. How was he killed ? Pray tell ?

Here comes the anti-gun rhetoric. I hope you're ready.

Even hippies love guns.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=itfms556DgE

[n2ize]

The avatar is the late guitarist from Pantera, and most recently Damageplan (metal bands). Darrell "Dimebag" Abbott. He was killed on stage in Columbus, OH a while back, you'll probably recall.

No. How was he killed ? Pray tell ?

Here comes the anti-gun rhetoric. I hope you're ready.

If there were no guns in the world nobodycould get shot with one.

I am not anti gun but what I am againstit bogus statistics that some pro gunners use to justify guns. There were a few times on the ZED where pro gunners argued that states with lax gun laws have much lower crime rates than states with tough gun laws. In part this holds true when you compare the stats for low population density states with lax gun laws against high population density states with tough gun laws. But when you even things up by comparing states that have similar demographics the argument rapidly crumbles.

That said I am all for having legal gun ownership albeit with some degree of sensible gun control. There are times when evil must be met with force and a gun can provide that level of protection. However,in general guns don't nessesarilly make societies safer.

At the same time if I knew for certain that by getting rid of guns we could have a world without violence,without war and killing and death then I would say that giving up all guns would not be a bad trade off for a world of nonviolence.

Go smack yourself upside the head a few times with a brick and you will change your opinion.

[KC8TCQ]

If there were no guns in the world nobodycould get shot with one.

I am not anti gun but what I am againstit bogus statistics that some pro gunners use to justify guns. There were a few times on the ZED where pro gunners argued that states with lax gun laws have much lower crime rates than states with tough gun laws. In part this holds true when you compare the stats for low population density states with lax gun laws against high population density states with tough gun laws. But when you even things up by comparing states that have similar demographics the argument rapidly crumbles.

That said I am all for having legal gun ownership albeit with some degree of sensible gun control. There are times when evil must be met with force and a gun can provide that level of protection. However,in general guns don't nessesarilly make societies safer.

At the same time if I knew for certain that by getting rid of guns we could have a world without violence,without war and killing and death then I would say that giving up all guns would not be a bad trade off for a world of nonviolence.


Here is my take on the whole gun ownership issue.

#1. the right to bear arms is a right given to us in the US constitution.
A. What were some of the first shots in the revolutionary war fired over? the Brits trying to remove pwder and shot from the general store.

#2. If they take away gun rights from the citizens, it won't take them away from the criminals (I give you the IRA - PIRA)

#3. It's not the guns that are evil, bad, mean, etc. It's the dumbasses who make the wrong decisions. They will continue to make those decisions no matter if guns are legal or not. Murder has been a crime committed by humans on earth long before guns existed. If some maniac decides to kill someone with a steak knife, should steaks be made illegal? because if you don't have steaks, you don't need steak knives.

Granted, civilians have no need for armor piercing ammo, I've been hunting for 30 years, never seen a deer with body armor.

[M0GLO]

If there were no guns in the world nobodycould get shot with one.

I am not anti gun but what I am againstit bogus statistics that some pro gunners use to justify guns. There were a few times on the ZED where pro gunners argued that states with lax gun laws have much lower crime rates than states with tough gun laws. In part this holds true when you compare the stats for low population density states with lax gun laws against high population density states with tough gun laws. But when you even things up by comparing states that have similar demographics the argument rapidly crumbles.

That said I am all for having legal gun ownership albeit with some degree of sensible gun control. There are times when evil must be met with force and a gun can provide that level of protection. However,in general guns don't nessesarilly make societies safer.

At the same time if I knew for certain that by getting rid of guns we could have a world without violence,without war and killing and death then I would say that giving up all guns would not be a bad trade off for a world of nonviolence.


Commie.

McDonalds sells hamburgers with buns
To those with quite enough funds
And the Constitution guarantees the right to bear arms
To those in the militia on them there farms
When they take my rifle away only cows will have guns.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQMbXvn2RNI

"I've been shot" said the man losing his innard
"I was a Conservative, now a Liberal" cried poor Menard
From James Brady to Christopher Reeves
They all turn Liberal to quell their pet peeves
'Cept for Gun hating Conservatives like Lynard Skynard

[nx6d]

I don't get the whole "gun thing" at all.

Never had an interest, really don't care.

I do have a hard time understanding why limiting ownership of military weapons like AK-47's somehow translates into the gub'mint taking away Billy Bob's shotgun used for squirrel shooting.

I really think a lot of the gun lobby rhetoric gets down to "gotta own one, otherwise my (part) isn't big enough". Guns = Power for some people, I suppose...

[n2ize]

If there were no guns in the world nobodycould get shot with one.

I am not anti gun but what I am againstit bogus statistics that some pro gunners use to justify guns. There were a few times on the ZED where pro gunners argued that states with lax gun laws have much lower crime rates than states with tough gun laws. In part this holds true when you compare the stats for low population density states with lax gun laws against high population density states with tough gun laws. But when you even things up by comparing states that have similar demographics the argument rapidly crumbles.

That said I am all for having legal gun ownership albeit with some degree of sensible gun control. There are times when evil must be met with force and a gun can provide that level of protection. However,in general guns don't nessesarilly make societies safer.

At the same time if I knew for certain that by getting rid of guns we could have a world without violence,without war and killing and death then I would say that giving up all guns would not be a bad trade off for a world of nonviolence.


Here is my take on the whole gun ownership issue.

#1. the right to bear arms is a right given to us in the US constitution.
A. What were some of the first shots in the revolutionary war fired over? the Brits trying to remove pwder and shot from the general store.

#2. If they take away gun rights from the citizens, it won't take them away from the criminals (I give you the IRA - PIRA)

#3. It's not the guns that are evil, bad, mean, etc. It's the dumbasses who make the wrong decisions. They will continue to make those decisions no matter if guns are legal or not. Murder has been a crime committed by humans on earth long before guns existed. If some maniac decides to kill someone with a steak knife, should steaks be made illegal? because if you don't have steaks, you don't need steak knives.

Granted, civilians have no need for armor piercing ammo, I've been hunting for 30 years, never seen a deer with body armor.

I'm not debating whether there should or should not be guns. I am merely pointing out that SOME of the claims made by the pro-gunners are not
supported by actual statistics.

I don't feel guns should be banned either. However,I do believe in sensible and realistic gun control. And gun control has been a part of society going way back. Even in the days of the wild west there were towns that had restrictions on if, when and where you could carry a gun.



. Murder has been a crime committed by humans on earth long before guns existed. If some maniac decides to kill someone with a steak knife, should steaks be made illegal? because if you don't have steaks, you don't need steak knives.


No but you can't deny that guns make it a lot eaier to kill a lot more people than a steak knife. With a steak knife you have to approach people one by one and attack them and there is a good chance you will have that steak knife taken away and getyour ass broken into pieces. With a gun you can blow someone or several people away from several feet to many yards away (depending on the gun) and they'll never even see you nor know what hit them.

[n2ize]

Go smack yourself upside the head a few times with a brick and you will change your opinion.

Change what opinion ? I am talking about statistic... numbers...values. Nothing is going to change them.

Gun control is not about banning guns. Nobody is taking away guns.

I knew a guy who got put in the hospital several years ago. Someone smashed his head open with a baseball bat. He never knew what hit him, never saw the person who did it. Like most crimes it happened in the twinkling of an eye, lasted a split second before anyone could react.
It wouldn't have mattered if he was armed or not.

When I was punched in the face in the street by some complete stranger then entire attack lasted a split second. before I knew what hit me the guy dissapeared into the night. had I had a gun it would not have made a single bit of difference.

Go smack yourself upside the head a few times with a brick and you will change your opinion.

Change what opinion ? I am talking about statistic... numbers...values. Nothing is going to change them.

Gun control is not about banning guns. Nobody is taking away guns.

I knew a guy who got put in the hospital several years ago. Someone smashed his head open with a baseball bat. He never knew what hit him, never saw the person who did it. Like most crimes it happened in the twinkling of an eye, lasted a split second before anyone could react.
It wouldn't have mattered if he was armed or not.

When I was punched in the face in the street by some complete stranger then entire attack lasted a split second. before I knew what hit me the guy dissapeared into the night. had I had a gun it would not have made a single bit of difference.

Riiight. Hit your head hard enough and you will come to the senses of a gun toting Conservative. Facts become opinion. Lies become truths. Dead brain cells are all you rely upon for thought.

[kf0rt]

I'm not debating whether there should or should not be guns. I am merely pointing out that SOME of the claims made by the pro-gunners are not supported by actual statistics.

And this implies that EVERY claim made by anti-gunners is true? :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

[n2ize]

Go smack yourself upside the head a few times with a brick and you will change your opinion.

Change what opinion ? I am talking about statistic... numbers...values. Nothing is going to change them.

Gun control is not about banning guns. Nobody is taking away guns.

I knew a guy who got put in the hospital several years ago. Someone smashed his head open with a baseball bat. He never knew what hit him, never saw the person who did it. Like most crimes it happened in the twinkling of an eye, lasted a split second before anyone could react.
It wouldn't have mattered if he was armed or not.

When I was punched in the face in the street by some complete stranger then entire attack lasted a split second. before I knew what hit me the guy dissapeared into the night. had I had a gun it would not have made a single bit of difference.

Riiight. Hit your head hard enough and you will come to the senses of a gun toting Conservative. Facts become opinion. Lies become truths. Dead brain cells are all you rely upon for thought.

Quite true... :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

[N3ATS]

I figure as long as the police still need their guns, I will still need mine.

My next phallic replacement... :mrgreen:

http://rockriverarms.com/images/cara2407.gif

[W4KLB]

:nosey: not much of a 223 fan inless i'm killing crows prefer bigger cal for med sized game like deer
bear,moose,demacrats :naughty: or it may be to make up for my other shortcomings. :think

[n2ize]

I don't get the whole "gun thing" at all.

Never had an interest, really don't care.

I do have a hard time understanding why limiting ownership of military weapons like AK-47's somehow translates into the gub'mint taking away Billy Bob's shotgun used for squirrel shooting.

I really think a lot of the gun lobby rhetoric gets down to "gotta own one, otherwise my (part) isn't big enough". Guns = Power for some people, I suppose...

For many years I was interested in guns, particularly target shooting. In high school I was part of the rifle team and was an excellent shooter. And I continued in shooting long after that. I was and still am a firm beliver in allowing guns for self defense. I never cared for hunting though. Shooting and killing an animal gives me no thrill.matter of fact it makes me kinda sick.

I don't shoot anymore and I am not into guns these days. That doesn't mean I wouldn't own a gun I simply don't see a gun as something I must have. Guns are not particulalrly interesting to me. I don't see them as "power". because they are not. No matter how tough a persons guns may be there will always be a tougher kid on the block. Nor do I see anything pretty about guns. To me they are not objects of beauty and in may regards can be spoilers of what's truly beautiful.

I have suspected in some cases guns are somewhat of an extension of the male "personna". Cars too. in some cases. To each their own I suppose. I certainly see no point or logic in banning guns.

[N3ATS]

:nosey: not much of a 223 fan inless i'm killing crows prefer bigger cal for med sized game like deer
bear,moose,demacrats :naughty: or it may be to make up for my other shortcomings. :think

You can get that rifle in .458 Socom, if that's more your style. :mrgreen: